Local Government TV

▼

Monday, February 13, 2017

Cashing In

The Obamas, our former first family, are ready to start cashing in. They've signed with the Harry Walker Agency for speaking gigs, and will soon be collecting fees between $100,000 and $175,000 for their pearls of wisdom. Ex Presidents Clinton and both Bushes are on this gravy train. Jimmy Carter seldom accepts a fee, but if he does, the proceeds go to charity.

Harry Truman is one ex-president who could have used the dough. When he left the Presidency, his sole source of government income was his $112.56 army pension. He had numerous opportunities to cash in, but said No. "I could never lend myself to any transaction, however respectable, that would commercialize on the prestige and dignity of the office of the presidency," he said.

Congress passed the Former President's Act in 1958 to "maintain the dignity" of the office. Under this law, former presidents are paid the same salary as a cabinet level official, about $205,000. They also receive office funding that usually is more than double their pension, as well as secret service protection.

I'm all for maintaining the dignity of the office, but Presidents who prostitute themselves as speakers defeat the purpose. I think the law should be modified to reduce the annual pension paid to an ex-President by any sum he receives from other sources.
at

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 10:05 AM

    I agree with Bernie's proposal. What the heck do the Clintons need $205,000 per year of the taxpayers' money for? That's pocket change to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 4:51 PM

      Why just the Clintons how about the Bushes

      Delete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.