You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
There is no legal justification for the ZHB to approve this exception so why is it taking them so long to turn this down & force the current owner to sell the home as a residence? It has been a residence since 1840 so how can they claim it can't be used as a residence again? This is Bethlehem chrony capitalism at work once again with politicians pressuring the ZHB to grant a favor to their buddy.
ReplyDeleteIt is a nonconforming use that pre-dates the zoning ordinance. The question is whether the nonconforming use applies to the entire tract or is limited in application. That's not a question of crony capitalism, but a question of law.
ReplyDeleteOne ZHB member, Bill Fitzpatrick, recused himself. That took the ZHB down to four. One of these members, Gus Loupos, had every intention of making a decision last night, but was hospitalized early in the week with pneumonia. That means a decision would have to come from three members, and they thought they would wait for Gus to recover first. Hopefully, Gus recovers quickly. This has nothing to do with political pressure. This has everything to do with pneumonia.
Instead of trashing everyone, why not wish Gus a speedy recovery?
I am not sure what the question is even about? There is already another financial services firm literally 30 feet away and a law office a couple more doors down. Many of the neighbors have even signed a petition in favor of the new zoning.
ReplyDeleteWe all wish Gus well but why a special meeting for this vote vs just voting at next regular meeting. Preston failed to prove that property cannot reasonably be converted to conforming residential--end of story!! Only the first floor of the Green building is a grandfarhered non-conforming use & it can easily lbe turned into residential to be conforming.
ReplyDeleteYou kill me. It is you who complained at 8:56 about the ZHB taking so long to make a decision. Now you are complaining that they should just wait until the next regular meeting. Which is it? Is there anything you don't complain about? Maybe you should be a blogger, too!
ReplyDeleteI did not know Gus was sick so when you informed me of that I then questioned why the need for a special mtg vs waiting 2 more weeks. My original point was that it should have been voted down the night of the hearing because Preston clearly failed to justify that this property cannot reasonably become conforming.
ReplyDeleteWhat was the decision on this matter--didn't see anything in the paper or online--was meeting held last night?
ReplyDeleteI was in Northampton County last night. I will find out.
ReplyDeleteThe Ruling: "SPECIAL EXCEPTION DENIED.
ReplyDeleteVARIANCE GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS:
1. Any renovations shall be substantially similar to what was testified.
2. There may be one single entity and it must be a professional office use as well as one residential use.
3. The 2nd floor of the current green buildings may only be storage for the professional office. If the residential unit is to be above the green buildings, the 2nd story of the garage may only be storage for the professional office.
4. Maximum number of employees may not exceed what was testified to (no more than 14)."