Local Government TV

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

The Feds' Case Against Matthew McTish

Below is the federal information against Matthew MbTish, filed in connection with the pay-t-play investigation in Allentown and Reading. It proves that I was right whenI suggested that Donor #2 was Matt McTish. It also indicates that the federal government is perfectly willing to prosecute the vendors and firms who profited from pay-to-play.

The information also identifies Public official #5, whom I believe is former Managing Director Fran Dougherty.

We know that Fed Ed's defense is, "Blame it all on Fleck." Jack McMahon is no doubt deeding that bullshit to the dailies. But here's what we know:
*  Fed Ed personally requested contributions during meetings about pending engineering contract (Para. 15);
*  Fed Ed, at a meeting with McTish on May 27, 2014, promised to help McTish get more engineering work in exchange for continued donations to "Friends of Ed Pawlowski." (Para. 12)
* On August 8, 2014, after Fed Ed learned that McTish had agreed to become a yearly sponsor to his PAC, he stated, "Okay, now I have to get him work." (Para. 13).
* At a meeting with McTish on April 27, 2015, Fed Ed said he could get him more work, but wanted him to raise $21,600 for his federal race. (Para. 17).

Information - McTish by BernieOHare

6 comments:

  1. Can you taste that prison food yet Paw'low'ski?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That grade D meat will be to his likeing, I am sure he will be dinning balonie for many a meal!?!!?!?

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.phillymag.com/citified/2016/05/10/larry-farnese-indictment/

    another philly senator charged.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Schloshedberg had be the middle this mess somewhere. He's not smart enough his Slimy handshands out of this morass.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pawlowski for Governor
    Pawlowski for Senator
    Pawlowski for Cell Block D

    That's quite a career path, all in the course of two years.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Public Official No.5 was always ready to play his role.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.