Local Government TV

Friday, December 04, 2015

Northampton County Says GoodBye, For Now, to Parsons and McClure

Peg Ferraro awards citations to Lamont McClure and Scott Parsons
Northampton County said good-bye, for now to Council members Lamont McClure and Scott Parsons just before the December 3 meeting. McClure, a Bethlehem lawyer who had served since his appointment in 2006, decided against seeking re-election this year. A fearless advocate of Gracedale, McClure also authored the ordinance under which the Northampton County Gaming Authority was formed. He was an unsuccessful candidate for Executive in 2013. It's hard to believe he'll be away for long.

Scott Parsons, who defeated Ron Angle in 2011, lost his bid for re-election this year in a heavily Republican district. In his four short years, he displayed a common sense attitude rare in a politician. A champion of open space, he won Northampton County's Workhorse award for two years in a row.

26 comments:

  1. McClueless is still clueless. Even when he shows up. If he runs fro executive even Brown wins. Good riddance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And good riddance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks to both McClure and Parsons for your support and reasoning throughout ur tenure. You will be missed. Best wishes in the future!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Since Parsons never vacated his seat at DEITZI'S he is welcomed back with open arms. Merry Xmas Mr. Parsons from your friends in the republican party who used you to oust Ron Angle.

    ReplyDelete
  5. District 4 “Heavily Republican”? Hah! There are fewer than 200 more registered Republicans than registered Democrats in District 4. That’s “Barely Republican” and likely to shift to Democrat next month.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe it to be fairly heavily R, but am willing to be educated.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When I look at these comments, ibis really hard to miss the negative tone at all but one comment. I think people who do that just make themselves look bad.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I hope I'm not included in the negative tone. I was just amused by the characterization of Council District 4 as heavily Republican. It's not and has not been. This year is the first in recent history and probably forever that Republicans actually outnumber Democrats in any Council District.
    It is true District 4 tends to vote Republican. In 2015, 821 more Republicans than Democrats voted in District 4.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I did include you, but am wrong. You were not being negative, but it gets hard sometimes after seeing so much negativity in other comments. My impression is that District 4 is heavily R, at least in municipal races. I do not have a breakdown by party that you just mentioned. Where did you get that? I'd like to check into it unless it is privileged information. The official results do not contain a party breakdown. At the polls, we do not ask what party in the general.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bernie by results, the only thing that really matters, District four votes heavily republican. Whether the democrats vote for republicans or many democrats don't bother to vote, it doesn't matter. The end result is that for years in county races district four goes republican.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Parsons was a good enough guy who showed up and worked hard. I like guys I can talk to across a bar stool. The more he got slammed on being at Dietzi's, the more I like him. McClure represented the very worst of local politics. His loss is addition by subtraction. May we never see his ilk again.

    ReplyDelete
  12. McClure didn't lose, what are you talking about? Do you even vote?

    ReplyDelete
  13. His loss from council, as in no longer being there. And yes, I've never missed voting, and enthusiastically voted against McClure every time I had the opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wonder if Barney Rubble will run for CE in 2017?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Your silence on the Islamic Terrorist Attack in San Bernardino, California, is deafening, BO.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 7:56. You are such an ass

    ReplyDelete
  17. What did McClure ever accomplish?

    ReplyDelete
  18. 1) Author of the gaming authority ordinance, which was no easy feat. That authority is fnctioning pretty well.

    2) Forceful advocate for keeping Gracedale county-owned.

    3) Assumed watchdog role that Angle held, although from a differing perspective.

    4) Added some intelligence to a board that sometimes appears to be woefully lacking in that department.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "Wonder if Barney Rubble will run for CE in 2017?"

    I don't know, Charles "Don't call me Charlie" Dertinger. Do tell.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think O'Hare is taking on the McClure defense. Could it be the McClure connection to mancrush Mr. Morganelli?

    You hammered McCluess for years, no one will buy this reversal as easily as some of your past reversals. The guy is a slug who didn't run for reelection because he would have been beaten big-time. Of the five people running as Dem's for CE in 2017 he may place third.

    ReplyDelete
  21. 5 people? Running for CE, do tell

    ReplyDelete
  22. I did Hammer McClure for years, and have admired Morganelli for years. My thinking about McClure has nothing to do with Morganelli. It changed when Lamont became a Council watchdog, started standing up for County workers and stood up to Brown. It's just that simple.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It changed when McClure was no longer watching Stoffa a Bernier mancrush and started watching Brown whom Bernie hates. Pay attention people it is not that hard to understand.

    ReplyDelete
  24. First, you claim I stopped hammering MCClure bc of Morganelli. Now it is Stoffa.the reality is exactly what I said. I think I'm a better judge of what I do and why than some anonymous coward.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Good point anonymous 2:41, and by the way anonymous, 9:04 do ur homwork, it's DETZI'S! It's the political hotbed stop in the slatebelt for all politicans! Ask any politican, they will tell u.

    ReplyDelete
  26. And ask Bernie, he will tell u too!

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.