Local Government TV

▼

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Bradley Demonstrates Transparency With Detailed Pre-Primary Report

Matt Dietz and Lorin Bradley are the two candidates seeking the Republican nomination to the slate belt and northern tier seat currently occupied by Scott Parsons. I told you about Dietz' report yesterday.

Bradley's report may have been one day late, but is perhaps the most detailed campaign expense report I've ever seen filed.

He reports $3,711 in contributions. This includes $1,000 from his friend Glenn Geissinger, with the rest of the money coming from his wife. What impresses me is his detailed explanation of expenditures, something I have never seen.
  • $373.12 for 1500 palm cards.
  • $1,597.64 for 500 yard signs.
  • $1,586.00 to political consultant Cheryl Corsa, for the first of what his report claims will be two mailers.
This is transparency.
at

7 comments:

  1. AnonymousMay 12, 2015 at 2:31 PM

    He's extraordinarily efficient - at raising Nazareth taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bernie O'HareMay 12, 2015 at 2:48 PM

    It's a point you've made several times.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMay 12, 2015 at 3:56 PM

    It's a point worth repeating and I appreciate your forum and forbearance, very much. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMay 12, 2015 at 4:18 PM

    If you want transparency, look no further than John Brown. If it smells like an AH, looks like an AH, acts like an AH - it's an AH.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousMay 12, 2015 at 4:34 PM

    Take the last comment and substitute "Stoffa" for "Brown." That's what county employees thought of the last executive, too. They're miserable and will never change until another Riebmann comes along to give away the store to unions. Same shit, different flies.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousMay 12, 2015 at 4:56 PM

    If Stoffa was regarded as an AH by county employees, then Brownstain is considered to be an elephant's AH and then some.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousMay 13, 2015 at 2:48 PM

    Corsa + Angle. Now you get Bernie's love of Bradley.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.