Local Government TV

Thursday, April 09, 2015

Morganelli: Revive Independent Counsel Act

NorCo DA John Morganelli
Few dispute that our courts have inherent powers to do whatever they need to do to make sure their orders are followed. Northampton County District Attorney John Morganelli, who incidentally is the most senior DA in the state, agrees with this principle. He has no quarrel with the Pa. Supreme Court's recent decision that sanctioned the use of a special prosecutor to investigate Grand Jury leaks. A special prosecutor was sought because that leak might be Attorney General Kathleen Kane herself. According to the Grand Jury, it was. Clearly, something had to be done. But in Morganelli's mind, there's still a "void" in this appointment process that has, at least in Kane's case, led to accusations of witch hunting. He believes we're better off providing the legislative framework for a special prosecutor. So he is asking the state legislature to revive the expired Independent Counsel Authorization Act.

For five years, in reaction to the prosecution and conviction of then AG Ernie Preate, Pennsylvania had an Independent Counsel Act, which laid out a process for investigations leading to the state's top prosecutor. But that law expired in 2003, and has never been revived.

There certainly is a reason to be concerned, as one justice has put it, about judges who "embark on independent ventures, sailing in ships without sails of authority, using engines devoid of constitutional power ad employing a compass lacking decisional direction."

Ironically, as DA John Morganelli was calling for a legislative framework, a state senate leader was unknowingly obliging him. According to Citizens Voice, Majority Whip John Gordner, R-Berwick asked fellow lawmakers to join him on Wednesday in re-establishing the Independent Counsel Authorization Act.

But nobody disputes that judges must have the authority to ensure that their own orders are being followed.

A prime example of this is United States v. Shipp, which is the only time that the United States Supreme Court conducted a criminal trial. A local sheriff and several others went to jail for contempt. Behind this trial is the Court;'s inherent authority to see that its own orders are followed.  It arises out a rape case in Tennessee, nearly 100 years ago.

All the victim could remember later was that her assailant had been black. The local Sheriff arrested a black man, who was charged and convicted despite the victim's inability to be sure that he was the man. He was sentenced to death. As evidence mounted that made it increasingly clear that that he had been framed, his unpopular black lawyer took the unheard of step of asking the Supreme Court to intervene. Even more unlikely, Justice John Harlan agreed to do so. He issued what is known as a writ of habeas corpus, demanding that state officials surrender the convicted prisoner into the custody of a United States Marshall.

Instead of doing that, the sheriff and others turned their heads the other way as an innocent man was dragged away and lynched.

Obviously, a Court is useless unless it has the power to ensure its own orders are followed.

Blogger's Note: This story, originally published at midnight, has been updated to reflect that the state Senate majority Whip has called for re-establishment of the Independent Counsel Authorization Act.

9 comments:

  1. But the Democrat couldn't bring himself to call for the Democrat's resignation. Thanks for playing politics, John. SSDD.

    ReplyDelete
  2. he is the most senior da because he has met his peter principle

    ReplyDelete
  3. He wants Kane's job. He ran for the job and got his butt kicked and he wants to run again and he will again lose. John is the best DA we ever had and he should stay here in Northampton County. We don't want to lose him. His pension will be huge and he can work part time to enjoy his golden years while he has his health. Stay here John, Don't worry about the State. We love you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 7:53,

    Nice comment, Bobby.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I swear I'm about 5 for 6 on seeing him at the restaurant each time I go out for dinner in Northampton county. Hopefully he enjoyed his meal tonight as my lowly presence anonymously graced him on my way out. I didn't recognize the two older guys with him. I've seen him dining with Lamont before, but I didn't recognized these non-suited guys.

    I'm not a "D" but I still respect him and think he's done a pretty respectable job.

    ReplyDelete
  6. John is a hard worker and is at the courthouse around 8 am. He also works weekends. I'll bet you that whatever dinner he was having was more than social.

    ReplyDelete
  7. He goes after low life parasitic scumbags that think they can ignore the law and court orders and make up their own rules. There is a lot to be said for that.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.