 |
| Credit Michael Molovinsky Facebook page. This is as close as he gets to a smile. |
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
The Morning Call article uses the phrase "science vs. sentiment".
ReplyDeleteI know what side I am on.
@10:19, the whole article slanted towards the wildlands and science. the problem is that the science isn't site specific. in wehr's case, right below the dam the creek dries up during periods of drought, because it's a "disappearing stream". that means that it has a limestone base, and the water goes below surface for 500 yards to beyond the covered bridge. needless to say fish can't swim underground through rocks. the dam actually keeps that more water in stream by regulating the amount that goes over it. the wildlands also generalized the science in lehigh parkway. the 12''robin hood dam was no barrier to the trout. worse, removing the trout nursery dam resulted in a massive fish kill this summer.
ReplyDelete"I know what side I am on."
ReplyDeleteYeah, whatever side Molovinsky is not. I have already deleted three of your personal attacks.
Because that's how BO rolls.
ReplyDelete