Local Government TV

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Brown Vetoes Residency Requirement: Updated 2:51 pm

Late yesterday afternoon, Northampton County Exec. John Brown vetoed the residency rule ordinance adopted by a bare majority of Council last week. Since six votes are needed to override the veto, and the ordinance only had the support of five council members, this may have killed any residency rule. "The requirements in the residency rule ordinance are restrictive," said Brown. "The ordinance limits our talent pool and is not conducive to effective and smart government."

Blogger's Note: Originally published 8/25/14, 5:30 pm

10 comments:

  1. predictable on browns behalf

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Brown acted with good judgment. This shouldn't be passed by the mere majority of votes. This needs to have the people's opinion weighed out to. Since the County is not offering the best of salaries, the employment opportunities should not be whittled down even more to require residency. We need the best people for the job, residents of the County or not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Best decision Brown has made to date.

    ReplyDelete
  4. FT = FIRE TRACHTA
    FT = FIRE TRACHTA
    FT = FIRE TRACHTA
    FT = FIRE TRACHTA
    FT = FIRE TRACHTA

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe there is some hope for this guy. Maybe. Good move.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It was a stupid idea, supported by stupid people, and proposed by one of the stupidest dopes in the county.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Brown did the right thing. He acted in the best interests not only of himself, but all future county executives. McClueless should be shamed for this senseless initiative.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous 9:44 and 9:06 I totally agree

    ReplyDelete
  9. In the end, I think if you want to feed at the trough, you should live in the pen, and do a little refilling yourself.

    Living under rules they enforce, subject to the impact of decisions they make and actions they take, and living among those to whom they are ultimately accountable. Same for the schools.

    -Clem

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.