Local Government TV

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

A Tale of Two Directors of Administration

Ryan Kish
By a 6-3 vote, Northampton County Council recently rejected Executive John Brown's nominee for Director of Administration, Cathy Allen. Council complained that Allen's education (a high school diploma) and her relative inexperience (two months of County employment) made her unqualified to administer a $360 million budget with 2,200 employees. But she's still Deputy Director. Before he went on a week's vacation in May, Brown designated Allen as the person to contact in his absence.

Hanover Township's budget and workforce is decidedly smaller than Northampton County. But at their May 27 meeting, Supervisors approved a new "Director of Administration" position, to be filled by Tresurer Ryan Kish at a annual salary of $55,000.

Kish has a Master's degree in Public Administration and Policy Planning, and two years of experience working under Township Manager Jay Finnigan.

27 comments:

  1. Maybe he will end up wo9rking for John Brown.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is the way you are supposed to make appointments. Maybe Brown should visit Hanover township with his pen and paper and start taking notes at every one of their meetings. He may learn something

    ReplyDelete
  3. Compared to the county position, Kish is an underachiever or poor negotiator or both.

    ReplyDelete
  4. He should have been Brown's administrator pick. The guy has 3X the education and experience of Allen and will be paid 40% less than the county position. Makes perfect sense in the bizarro world of Norco politics.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 7:59, He probably never went after the County position, sure he may be making less money, but it is the smart move career wise. Hanover and the County are two polar extremes, one good government, one a mess. Maybe this is Finnagans pick as his successor.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The young pup is too wet behind the ears for the county position. He lacks the "street smarts" necessary for the dog-eat-dog world of county politics.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I doubt Kish went after the county position. Any professional would be reluctant to go for an exempt position.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kish will be learning from one of the best. Mr. Brown should really be getting his advice from people like Finnegan. Hard worker, rolls up his sleeves and has the utmost respect of his peers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jay is one of the best, but township managers are not going to apply for the county position. The pay is too low and there is no real job security. In addition, you are subjected to ridicule.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Excellent point, Bernie. Especially if working for a one-term executive like Brown.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This guy is being severely under paid.

    ReplyDelete
  12. But then again, Hanover Twp is the size of a postage stamp. They shouldn't even need this position.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Any professional would be reluctant to go for an exempt position.

    What does this mean? Pretty much every white collar job is "exempt" - otherwise known as "salaried".

    ReplyDelete
  14. What this means is that anyone who works in a cabinet position is at will, very vulnerable and subject to political winds. The winds are more steady at the township and borough level, and there is less politics.

    ReplyDelete
  15. All of us are "at will" unless you have some sort of contract that binds the employer. Is the guy under contract with Hanover Twp? "Exempt" is probably the wrong term to use here.

    By the way, your CAPTCHAs are really hard to read.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I have no choice unless you want to see this blog flooded with more spam.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Exempt is the correct term and is used in the Administrative Code and HRC to refer to these at will employees who serve at the pleasure of the Exec.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Can't Executive Callahan do something about this???

    ReplyDelete
  19. Johnnie Casino is on the lecture tour promoting his new book "How to Screw Up a Political Campaign You Should Win in a Landslide."

    ReplyDelete
  20. And what exactly does this have to do with this post?

    ReplyDelete
  21. No sense of disingenuous humor BO.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This has nothing to do with humor. You go completely off topic to disparage someone in the private sector.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Exempt is the correct term and is used in the Administrative Code and HRC to refer to these at will employees who serve at the pleasure of the Exec.

    OK, but I'm sure his current job is also "exempt" which merely means they are not bound by the 40 hour work week.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 1:36. Your an idiot

    ReplyDelete
  25. 1:36. Your an idiot

    Says the asshat that doesn't understand the use of contractions.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Well, it was an interesting story and it's the right way you are supposed to make arrangements for meeting. And for sure there's so much of learning scope here for everyone.

    Payroll Business

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.