Local Government TV

Friday, December 27, 2013

Two Bethlehem Police Chiefs?

Incoming Bethlehem Mayor Bob Donchez nominated Lt. Det. Mark DiLuzio as the City's next police chief in early December, but the current occupant of that office reportedly refuses to go gentle into that good night. Chief Craig Finnerty, who was just confirmed in August, is apparently dragging his feet. He is refusing to make way for his successor.

When he was confirmed, Chief Finnerty acknowledged that the incoming mayor has the right to appoint whomever he wants.

I attempted to contact Finnerty, but he's on vacation until January 2.

Updated 11:15 AM: Chief Finnerty contacted me and told me he will be stepping down.

31 comments:

  1. Jeez, this is the type of article I'd expect from the local rags, no substance and very shallow.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now you did it . You attacked a Callahan clan member.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't get it. A lot of people take off between Christmas and New Year's. How does that make him dragging his feet. He would be chief until January 6th anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  4. He is Chief until January 6th. Council gets to approve the new Chief that day, and Donchez gets sworn in a mayor.

    What do you want Finnerty to do? Quit or resign now and let DiLuzio take over?

    Seems that you are reaching for a story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No. I heard from several people who should know that Finneryt does not want to step downa nd was not making things easy for his successor. The Cheif has now assured me he will abide by Donchez' wishes. Had I heard from him sooner, this probably would not be a story.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Craig is a great guy. He should be the Chief.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So Morganelli was wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I heard about this from several people. None was Morganelli.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "I heard from several people who should know..." sounds a lot like, "word on the street is..."

    Craig Finnerty is a good cop and you should have given him the benefit of asking him directly.

    "Had I heard from him sooner, this probably would not be a story..." Additionally, why does the Chief of Bethlehem have to report to you for a story? I'm sure Craig is disappointed, but your verbiage trashes his distinguished career.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Given the defensive reaction from people like you, I'm glad I posted the story. This was not some made up horse shit. I heard this from three completely different sources in a position to know. Also, I did attempt to contact the chief, but he is on vacation until Jan 2. So I went with the story. The chief contacted me and I updated my post. At no time did I attack his reputation or his integrity. I simply reported that several sources have claimed he is showing no inclination to leave. He has now responded that he will respect the Mayor 'a wishes. So whatever power play you were considering, it's over.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I suspect that the "sources in a position to know" had an agenda or "whatever power play they were considering". But Craig's integrity showed, even during his vacation, he took the time to contact a "bottom feeding" blogger to set the record straight. And, yes, this was made up horse shit and you were played by the "sources in a position to know" for their agenda. Lastly, your defense of your story lacks an apology to the Chief.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wow!! The self proclaimed marketer for the city, social media and blog expert needs to chill out. She spends entirely too much time posting here and defending Callahan cronies.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 3:41, I reported a story based on reliable information from multiple sources. I had not spoken to the Chief and made that clear. When I did get to speak to him, I reported what he said. I have no obligation to apologize for reporting that Finnerty was apparently dragging his feet, not do I owe him or anyone an apology. You seem to think these people are above scrutiny, and imply that one who just questions what is going on is attacking that person's integrity. The commenter above is right. You need to relax.

    Chief Finnerty is a decent man and a good police officer who takes his job seriously. Nothing I have written in any way casts a dark light on that. Even if he refused to step aside, he could have legitimate reasons for doing so. So I don't really get your whining here. That is what it sounds like,by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  14. it's not who u know it's who u blo......

    ReplyDelete
  15. anon 9:44 if you mean Karner. Amen. She is a Callahan clan member in the middle of the Donchez organization.

    She will explode at someone within a year!

    ReplyDelete
  16. and they are right!

    Hit a nerve??

    ReplyDelete
  17. You hit no nerve. Anonymous weekend trolls are never right. They are just losers who don't even have the guts to sign their name.

    ReplyDelete
  18. craig was the orst possible choice for chief but then look at the options.... he is an ass and was only a temp as proven..now after many years of disapponting chiefslike bedics, donches and a few others we will finally have a real chief to head a real police dept....now we need to get rid of the riff raff cops and make this a safe town again...GOOG JOB MAYOR DONCHES

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sources close to donchez have been told city council may not approve his choice for chief.

    ReplyDelete
  20. His best bet is if they don't approve the Callahan plant, Karner.

    ReplyDelete
  21. jeez, I can't wait to hear how everyone feels about the new fire chief!

    ReplyDelete
  22. The new fire chief is qualified. She has support from the ranks.

    DiLuzio is a grudge guy; a holdover from the DelGrosso/Ehrsam vs. Callahan/Cunningham fiasco. Doncez chose him for the wrong reasons: a political choice for Chief of Police, and the first time a new mayor replaced a non-retiring police chief as part of his cabinet creation.
    Maybe Finnerty isn't the right guy, but if a new guy was needed, was DiLuzio the best choice?
    Public Safety isn't a political game. The cop who supports your campaign shouldn't be the one who gets the job, and most, if not all, DiLuzio supporters are Callahan-haters: not a reason to support anyone for Chief of Police.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Since Callahan was leaving office, I think this should have been an acting chief appointment.

    ReplyDelete
  24. anyone who believes the new fire chief nominee is supported by the ranks must not know anyone in the ranks. we firefighters tend to prefer bosses who have shown they can "walk the walk". she has not done that. of course, when you consider the person she is replacing is legally blind and can't get out of a chair without wheezing and gasping for breath. she's probably an improvement.

    ReplyDelete
  25. New fire chief is all about herself! She tried to get a assistant chief fired by accusing him of sexual harassment. She wanted the city too give her early retirement to drop the law suit. The city did not and she loss the case because there was no merit. She also refused to go into a fire because she said "I was hesitant" she can not even take equipment out of the trucks because is to heavy. I am all for female fire fighter. The ones that can do the job. She can't. Unfortunately the best place for her is behind a desk. Another department head that does not live in the city. Upper Mount Bethel is a long ride when there is an emergency here in Bethlehem.

    ReplyDelete
  26. She has withdrawn her name. Nice one Bobby D. Predict the next appointment to explode in his face will be old F-bomb Karner.

    ReplyDelete
  27. People like you are so negative it's no wonder you're reduced to anonymous comments on a blog.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hmmmmm. Wonder why she withdrew her name. No way she would make more on retirement. Should will receive 70% of her highest salary in her last 3 years. Once again she is full of shit. What is the real reason?

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.