Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Bethlehem Police OT Budget Being Handled Properly
Instead of creating a big OT buffer into a municipal budget, it is a good idea to set it a bit on the low side, and force department heads to come in and explain the need for an increase, justifying it to the governing body. In Bethlehem's case, it appears that police can explain why they have gone over their OT budget This exercise is infinitely preferable to a big cushion that can be spent in December.
15 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
If course you would defend Callahan's goof-up. Fortunately, there is now another venue to get the facts out there on the radio.
ReplyDeleteThink you are incorrect on this one Bernie. It is unethical to not budget accurately and a disservice to taxpayers. Transparent government means complete honesty
ReplyDeleteand not withholding information , especially financial.
Mr. Gregory, please look into this overtime matter.
ReplyDelete2:11 agreed.
ReplyDeletejust another budget trick - they knew from past history that they couldn't make it on $100,000 OT.
the reporter is obviously a pawn in this game - no real investigation into past budgets
This is exactly the kind of Callahan budgetary sleight-of-hand that Charlie Dent warned us about. It's simply unethical and dishonest to not properly budget proper amounts ahead of time. That you would defend this dishonesty is understandable, given your documented, oily ethics.
ReplyDeleteI believe it is entirely appropriate to keep OT budgets a shade on the low side and make departments come in and justify OT. That is about as transparent as you can get.
ReplyDeleteYou especially want to monitor OT budgets for police and fire very closely bc they are so susceptible to abuse. The best way to do that is keep them just a little low.
ReplyDeleteThe negative comments clearly don't know the facts. Police overtime was budgeted based on prior years. This year circumstances beyond the imagination on the police chief, mayor and business admin. Have created a need for more overtime. There are no less than 14 officers out on short term disability or workers compensation. How can you plan that at least 3 officers suffered leg injuries while on duty or 2 officers needed back surgery. You can't.
ReplyDeletemilking the system - that's what cops do best
ReplyDelete"...a shade on the low side..."? This is August, not December.
ReplyDeleteThere may well be a reason why OT is over budget, but to portray this as an example of good budgeting technique is ridiculous.
I disagree. I like the idea of requiring department heads to come in and air out the reasons for OT. In Bethlehem's case, they appear to be legitimate. I would much rather hear that than read some audit, three years later, describing how Allentown firefighters milked the system. This is more real time and is much more transparent. I believe City Council and Callahan did the right thing here.
ReplyDelete7:41 has it right. There have been a lot of officers out on injury, both work and non-work related. More so than in years past. You can't budget for that. People wouldn't want to see their taxes raised to fund potential what ifs.
ReplyDeleteThis is a real heads up budget deal - broke in Aug.
ReplyDeleteyep - real good deal.
I know. You'd rather see a big pot of money and no scrutiny. Do you realize how stupid your thinking is?
ReplyDeleteExpose this fraud Mr. Gregory.
ReplyDelete