Local Government TV

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Marles: ZHB Has No Jurisdiction To Decide on Psychiatric Hospital

Att'y Blake Marles tells zoners they have no jurisdiction
A 5-acre vacant tract at the southeast corner of Dewberry Avenue and Center Street is without doubt the most litigated property in Bethlehem. At one time it was the site for future expansion of Memorial Park Cemetery. Nobody minded. But since Abe Atiyeh acquired the property in 2007, you need a road map to figure out what's going on there. A large "Hospital Coming Soon" sign decorating the property has annoyed the neighbors, so now there's three of them. That hospital, which does not appear to be coming anytime soon, was the subject of a Special Zoning Hearing Board meeting on May 7. Over thirty residents, many of them familiar faces from numerous Atiyeh hearings, sacrificed a beautiful Spring evening for a meeting that lasted about forty minutes. No testimony was taken because Atiyeh's Attorney, Blake Marles, told zoners they have no jurisdiction.

Atiyeh's contentious relationship with the Zoning Hearing Board actually started on a positive note, when he originally bought the property. Though the property is zoned for institutional uses like schools and hospitals, he successfully sought a variance for an assisted living center. But when he was unable to market it, he asked zoners to let him build luxury apartments instead. They said No. He asked again. They said No again. Northampton County and Commonwealth Court judges said No, too.

So Atiyeh responded with a plan for a use that is permitted under the zoning ordinance - the Brookside Drug, Alcohol and Psychiatric Hospital. Though a permitted use, this lockdown facility for the mentally ill would be just a few yards from Bethlehem Catholic High School. His plans were tossed by the Planning Commission at a hearing attended by approximately 80 people, most of them opposed.

"I haven't heard a basis for a denial. Not a single one," said an astonished Blake Marles.

Att'y Blake Marles reviews paperwork with Abe Atiyeh
Judge Smith, on appeal, agreed with Marles. He concluded that the Planning Commission "improperly invaded the province of the City of Bethlehem Zoning Hearing Board by making a determination of whether the use is a permitted use ... ." But instead of sending the case back to the Planning Commission, he remanded it to the Zoning Hearing Board. They had never heard the matter.

At the May 7 hearing, everyone was lawyered up. In addition to Blake Marle, Atiyeh had Mark Malkames on standby, Professional Engineer David Harte and a videographer recording everything. Bethlehem residents, led by Greg Zebrowski and Stewart Early, had Easton barrister Steve Goudsouzian. Given the number of lawyers and experts on hand, nothing got done.

Blake Marles threw a legal monkey wrench into the mix. "What the Judge has asked the Zoning Hearing Board to do, they do not have the legal authority to do," he argued. He noted that the Municipal Planning Code provides eight ways in which zoners can assume jurisdiction, from a substantive challenge to the ordinance to special exception. But a Zoning Hearing Board has no authority to issue an "advisory opinion" on a land development application.

Goudsouzian countered that whether Judge Smith is right or wrong, this is "the law of the case" and it must be followed. "Whenever a decision is made in a case, that is the law that must be followed," he argued. "If you don't hear the case, you've essentially defied a court order."

Marles pointed out that it;s unclear what zoning issues, if any, are out there. So he asked zoners to review the entire file of the Planning Commission before ruling on his request.

After a brief executive session, zoners agreed to review the Planning Commission's file. "We will look over the Planning file to make the right decision," explained Special Solicitor Erich J. Schock, who represents the Zoning Hearing Board in all matters Atiyeh. "We need to have the right information."

Zoners will meet again on Tuesday, June 4, 6PM, at the Town Hall rotunda, to decide whether they can even hear this matter.

9 comments:

  1. "Given the number of lawyers and experts on hand, nothing got done."

    Amen, quote of the night!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe that guy was a confederate general.

    I say, I say, boy!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Colonel has returned!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Abe, Just hrow some cash JohnnyCasino's way Im sure He will find a way to make it happen......

    ReplyDelete
  5. The person be is throwing cash and in-kind contributions at is asbestos lawyer "maclure"

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well the judge made a HUGE MISTAKE. this is not a zoning issue as it is an at right use as printed in the code of the city of bethlehem.

    Not a zoning hearing board issue. period.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Damm abe you are begining to look like one of your earlier cohorts allentowns own king palumpashitsky and it look like you have aquired some of his circus court jesters allso¿

    Your freind allways GPS

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why do you let Redd comment here? He is a troll.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just trollin mackin and crackin the truth and havin fun allways make me giggle when I see the circus acts going on¿ The thing that makes me have a good belly laugh is the public officials play into it¿ Was david hart the real david hart or the one that gave testamonie in front of allentown zoning behind the junkyard on 4th st¡

      Delete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.