Local Government TV

Wednesday, November 07, 2012

Simmons Wins By 562 Votes!

Just received word that State Rep. Justin Simmons has survived Kevin Deely's challenge. 562 votes. Deely, a school teacher, was clearly out of his element, as demonstrated by a debate between the two a few weeks ago. But thanks to PSEA money and Allentown voters, he very nearly pulled off an upset. The Morning Call appears to have it wrong.

Lehigh County's vote tally shows Simmons up by 132 votes, in contrast to earlier reports.  Northampton County shows Simmons ahead by 430 votes.

25 comments:

  1. This outcome, proves that unions have zero impact in the election process today.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Backroom deal? In a year where national Democrat's did pretty well, Simmons held on to the 2nd most Democrat seat held by a Republican in the PA House. You may not like or agree with him, but come on! Give him some kudos for hard work. The guy is trying to make a difference.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Be it known that with the activation of the new redistricting alignment in 2014, Simmons is a lame-duck in the Allentown Precincts he serves. This is also the case with Steve Sammuelson and Dan MCNeil if indeed McNeil is the victor in the 133rd. As it will occur the South Side of Allenton in a completely new district won't be selectin an incument as there will be no incumbent. But most of the East Side will be pushed and dragged into the 132nd in 2014 where there will be an incumbent Slossberg. Because of this any East Side candidate won't have a eaual chance of replacing Slossberg who will have the advantage of incumbency.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Simmons polled behind Dent and Romney in his areas. He's the weak link in the GOP's 131st. I'm guessing because he's a Tea Party guy in a moderate district. The state party sees him as vulnerable. As an incumbent who had much more money than his challenger he should have done a lot better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good...now Corbett has his rubber stamp back.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 6:18 AM is spot on Deely had no chops as a first timer. Should a women challege justin in the next Republican primary, he's toast.His stance on womens issues will be his downfall.

    ReplyDelete
  7. " As an incumbent who had much more money than his challenger he should have done a lot better."

    Deely was well-funded.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Two of the last four years have been gridlock. It is not a good thing, as evidenced by the drop in our credit rating. I understand the need to stand on principle, but there is also a need to listen to each other. Two many left wing Dems and right wing Rs are unwilling to do that.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If they only knew beforehand about 2626 and how he voted...just keep giving the money away!

    http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&sessYr=2011&sessInd=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=2626&pn=3997

    ReplyDelete
  10. If Deely hadn't smoked all of his campaign cash he'd have had a better shot.

    Don't bogart that joint my friend.

    ReplyDelete



  11. Again is this the best we have?

    Simmons barely beat a bad candidate and he was well financed!

    ReplyDelete



  12. Simmons should begin the search for employment!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Simmons received 1004 more votes than Romney in the district, while Deely got 1403 fewer than Obama. Not a bad showing by any means.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Uh oh!! Time for "Rubber Stamp Simmons" to move to center and stop rubber stamping Corbett or he'll have to start using his college degree in two years. Wait a minute, his college degree is in Poly Sci--never mind, he can't do anything else.

    ReplyDelete


  15. Simmons should stop the Charade in Harrisburg, get Married and use his position for his own benefit, like everyone else on the public dime!

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Deely creeps need to learn to lose with some dignity.

    Light a fatty. Put on some Allman Brothers. Relax.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Simmons is against Same sex marriage, but he married a woman in December. appearances can be deceiving.
    With McKenzie winning in the district next door, maybe Justin and Ryan can share hotel rooms in Harrisburg. No one would be the wiser.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Gridlock?...surely you mean at the federal level...because the last time I checked, at the state level, Simmons belongs to the party that cut education by $2 billion, raised property taxes, voted to stick vaginal probes inside of women, and attempted to disenfranchise thousands of voters...oh, and he also voted to gerrymander his own district even further...truly a centrist, free thinker.

    ReplyDelete
  19. We should put a giant inflatable baby in front of Deely's house... the crybaby that he is.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "Simmons received 1004 more votes than Romney in the district, while Deely got 1403 fewer than Obama. Not a bad showing by any means."


    Is this true? If so,that sure looks like a voter irregularity.



    ReplyDelete
  21. Pot smoking can make one irregular.

    ReplyDelete


  22. That Upper Saucon District needs reviewed, This District came in last in 2010 and Won the seat for Simmons.

    He lost every other District., similar to the way Deely lost.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Seems unlikely that Simmons lost every poll in 2010 except Calvary seem to remember a big win in Lower Saucon and Lower Milford. however, that is a christian church not like the Baptist, Lutheran and catholic churches at other polls so maybe God came in and smitted the unholy Sodom and Gomorrah lifestyle of Karen Beyer, Mike Horton and Pot Smoking Kevin Deely and gave him the win. You never know stranger things have happened Barack Obama got reelected

    ReplyDelete


  24. The "JILTED" one is at it again!!

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.