Local Government TV

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

88% of Deely's Money Comes Wrapped in a Union Label

Deely at Labor Day Parade in Bethlehem
State House candidate Kevin Deely, an Easton High School teacher and union activist, clearly derailed at the DeSales debate. After that, I wrote him off as a serious candidate. He is seriously uninformed on most state issues, and that became apparent very quickly. But I forgot that few people in the Lehigh Valley watch televised debates. Fewer still read the blogs. So quite a few Democrats in the 131st District, who had already decided to vote for Obama, voted straight party. As a result, incumbent Justin Simmons is hanging by a one-vote lead in Lehigh County, although he's still up by 430 votes in Northampton County.

In addition to the lever pullers, Deely's campaign was heavily funded by the unions. 88% of his $130,000 warchest is wearing that union label. His biggest union contributor is PSEA. After all, he was President of the teachers' union in Easton, where he's known for rejecting federal funding when tied to teacher performance. He also organized a rally when school administrators balked at an average 12.57% average raise for teachers in the height of the Great Recession.

That union label is apparent among his individual contributors, too. They include union activist James Schlener, who lost his job as a Bethlehem firefighter after being picked up for DUI while supposedly on sick leave. Schlener and other contributing union activists, like Jim Gregory and former LV Labor Council President John Werkheiser, live outside the 131st legislative district.

Simmons raised about the same amount of money as Deely. His largest contributor, by far, is $30,000 from the House Republican Campaign Committee.

But Deely does not list the $98,000 that state Democrats paid for TV ads. Maybe he forgot.

30 comments:

  1. If Deely did not list the $98,000
    he received for ads, is that illegal?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bernie
    When will this election decision be official? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 6:44, It might be. It might not be. It might be considered an "independent expenditure," in which case there would be no need for Deely to report it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Bernie for posting this.
    This speaks volumes on what Deely's real intentions are. He will answer to the Unions.I wonder if the good people of the Lehigh Valley knew this before they went to the polls if the outscome of the elcetion might have swayed more toward Simmons. I say yes.
    Doesnt matter ...Deely loses anyway.Simmons beats the Unions!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Can you also publish the campaign contributions of the other local candidates?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will get around to it, but wanted this out there since this is the closest race.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It comes wrapped in the union label and goes wrapped in Zig Zags.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Talk about a major conflict of interest on Deeley's part. May be the push for recount is widely based on the constiuency who paid for all his advertising ! Who actually pays for this recount ? Is it the tax payer? Talk about a disregard for use of time and resources. When will the nail finally be placed in this coffin ? It is time to move on !

    ReplyDelete
  9. How convenient his financials come out the day after the election. Don't know if it would have mattered the people paying attention to this race voted against Deely 60/40. The sheeple in Allentown were just voting to keep their lifestyle of handouts from the Obama administration and Deely caught the straight D voter wave. Wonder if Kathleen Kane will go after him for campaign finance fraud?

    ReplyDelete


  10. Win or lose, Deeley has diminished Simmons and his Grand-standing tactics.

    50% of the present voters disagree with Simmons.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Deeley is a bottom feeding maggot! Gad my kids did not go to Easton schools!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Deeley is a bottom feeding maggot! Gad my kids did not go to Easton schools!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. So, Simmons recieved the bulk of his funding from Harrisburg insiders, but Deely recieved his from union members...and this is a positive for Simmons how?

    ReplyDelete
  14. So, Simmons recieved the bulk of his funding from Harrisburg insiders, but Deely recieved his from union members...and this is a positive for Simmons how?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Doesn't matter who wins. The People, The individual will get screwed yet again.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Based on the recent Presidential election, this country supports both private and public unions. Nothing to see here. Move on.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anon 12:36--you are so right.

    Problem is, Bernie can't find any faults with Simmons. I'm beginning to think Simmons feeds him his posts directly.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hey! I always vote straight party. Who in their right mind would vote for any Republican? Democrats are for the working man.

    Allentown Democrat Voter

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bernie,

    America is becoming Allentown.

    Scott Armstrong

    ReplyDelete
  20. Just another swing of the pendulum, Scott. It will go your way again.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I went through both candidates financials today and was amazed at what I discovered. Mr. Deely received $25,000 from the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers, $25,000 from the Teachers Union, $15,500 from SEIU. Only 4 individuals from the district he hopes to serve gave him a donation. On the other hand, Mr. Simmons had over 90 individual donations within the district. I couldn't tell how many either received in the under $50 category since that is just a cumulative number with no individual donor listed. The amount of union money Mr. Deely received makes this voter believe that he would not be representing our community, but would be obligated to one particular group. With the pension funding problems affecting everyone who pays taxes in Pennsylvania, I'm afraid Mr. Deely would only be concerned with protecting his own interests.

    ReplyDelete



  22. Simmons should get married.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bernie,

    sadly it's not that simple.

    Scott Armstrong

    ReplyDelete
  24. Deely is a pot smoking dirt ball. Surprised there aren't large expenses for Doritos and twinkes. He wasted his donors money like he would have wasted taxpayers. Glad he lost. Now go away pot head you had your 10 minutes of fame.

    ReplyDelete



  25. Either one was an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The incumbants in the state house win over99% of the time (this year only 2 incumbants lost out of 203), no matter how much money these clowns throw at it. People , like the express/slimes, call for change every year then vote these vultures back in!

    jus sayin

    ReplyDelete
  27. They dont have to do a good job, and few do. It takes a major screwup to lose. Drunks? Got them. Druggies? check. Wife beaters? yup.
    Tax-cheats? of course. We could do much better, but its about the MONEY!

    ReplyDelete
  28. To Anon 6:29

    You are one uninformed voter!
    Democrats lure working class people like yourself to THINK they are for the working man when in fact they raise taxes on all then give it away to lower income people to bolster their voting base. This guy Deely you voted for negotiated a teacher contract that forced property taxes to go up 16%
    in Easton. DID YOU KNOW THAT ! Probably not because your one of thousand who did the same thing..You pulled the D ticket voting for Obama not knowing that Deely is a Union Thug who's best interest is raising your taxes to get better teacher contracts and protect their pensions AT YOUR EXPENSE.I hope I taught you something today you fool.

    ReplyDelete


  29. Both Deely and Simmons should share the seat, they both had the same amount of VOTES.

    Both could wear Military type suits similar to an Argentine General.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.