Local Government TV

Friday, July 27, 2012

Commw Court Asks - Pig in the Parlor or the Barnyard?

Yesterday, a divided Commonwealth Court decided that localities, and not the state, have the right to decide whether the pig belongs in the parlor or the barnyard. Speaking for a four-judge majority, President Judge Dan Pellegrini invalidated most of a state law that trumps local zoning control over Marcellus shale gas drilling.

Pellegrini reasoned that if state lawmakers usurp local control over oil and gas mines, it's only a matter of time before they decide that industrial chicken farms and fireworks plants should be allowed in residential zones. "It would allow the proverbial 'pig in a parlor instead of the barnyard,'" writes the President Judge.

Just as colorfully, dissenting Judge P. Kevin Brobson quips that "this particular pig ... can only operate in parts of this Commonwealth where its slop can be found."

The Court's decision, incidentally, has some interesting language about standing and special legislation.

While making no references to pigs, Congressional candidate Matt Cartwright praised the decision for restoring "the autonomy of local municipalities in protecting the air and water of our local neighborhoods. Once again, citizens can expect look to local elected officials to stand up to forces that may pose environmental threats to local communities.”

Cartwright added that he hopes state lawmakers "will take this as a cue to enact responsible environmental regulations, charge a fair severance tax on drillers, and allow local communities to protect themselves from future environmental harm.”

24 comments:

  1. Bernie,

    In other words, the Court overturned the Republican agenda, in their attempt to control local issues.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ironically, The E-T reports that Bethlehem Twp. is looking at limiting the size of a township famer's cattle herd.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon 545am can't we just celebrate a good decision by the court to overturn a bad law instead of using it to bash Republicans?

    Then someone would have to bring up Obamacare or some other trashy Democratic law and then off we go.

    Please try, we all need to.

    The Banker

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now allow the municipalities to tax the marcellus shale idiots and keep the monies in their communities.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The sky is falling! They're coming for our children! Oh the humanity!

    Assholes:

    http://www.northcentralpa.com/feeditem/2012-07-26_long-overdue-epa-finally-clears-dimock%E2%80%99s-water-0

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sal's ready to chase drilling out of Easton. Good for him. Perhaps the King of Krypton will come town with jobs to offer someday. He'll get a key to the city and the red carpet treatment at the high school sports hall of fame anchor project. Dimock PA has cleaner water and more jobs than Easton. And no gunfire!

    ReplyDelete
  7. This was a Bad Republican agenda Law to controle Local Government issues.
    Obama Care is another Bad Law made by Democrats and Republicans.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rep. Simmons pushed this Legislation and Voted for the passage of this Law.

    ReplyDelete
  9. @ 6:07 Kevin Deeley, do come out from your cloud of anonymity...

    Corbitt needs to be impeached for this and other blatant mis-uses of government!

    ReplyDelete
  10. You're right, This was Corbett and Simmons Bill. They pushed this as their Signature piece of Legislation. This was also hailed as one of the largest TAX increases in State History.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You're right, This was Corbett and Simmons Bill. They pushed this as their Signature piece of Legislation. This was also hailed as one of the largest TAX increases in State History.

    ReplyDelete
  12. We were Betrayed!

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's not notable when a Politician proposes and then votes for a piece of legislation that is then passed....and later over-turned by the Courts.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Judge Simpson was a dissenter

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes, he was. But as in this case, the voter ID case is going to the Supreme Court. So whatever is decided, it will get another look from the Court of Final Error.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bernie,

    It just got better,
    immediately after this decision, CORBETT, Justine SIMMONS and Company appealled the Decision to the State Supreme Court. This will Cost Local TAXPAYERS additional funds.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Corbett and Simmons, their attempting to Limit local Government, to consolidate power in Harrisburg.

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's "They're," not "their." I would think Kevin Deely, who proclaims himself a teacher, would have a better understanding of grade school grammar.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bernie,

    It wasn't Daley who made the mistake with Their, there or They're.

    Sorry! lol

    ReplyDelete
  20. I will assume every OT anonymous shot at Simmons is coming from Deely.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous 10:47:

    I do not oppose responsible, safe and WELL regulated gas drilling.
    I clicked on the link that you provided. It is a link to a publication that has been bought and paid for by the gas industry, so the credibility of the piece is in question. Did you happen to read the comment at the bottom of the article?
    Unless you have served as an elected official and have had your hands tied by the state as it relates to protecting the health and welfare of your constituents, you will never understand the detriment a piece of legislation like act 13 can cause a community.

    Your use of profanity directed at anyone who does not agree with you is unwarranted.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The appeal will be interesting, as the decision made little sense legally, no matter which side of the issue one is on. Since municipalities only have the powers the legislature gives them, on what conceivable basis could the Commonwealth Court say that the state can't choose to regulate by itself certain issues previously granted (by the legislature)to the municipalities to control locally?

    ReplyDelete
  23. From a legal perspective you are probably right Blake.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.