Local Government TV

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Williams Township Endorses NIZ Intervention By State Ass'n

Supervisor George Washburn
At last night's meeting, Williams Township's Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to support a statewide association of township supervisors in a legal challenge to the 2009 law creating Allentown's Neighborhood Improvement Zone (NIZ).

The Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors  represents the interests of 1,455 townships in the commonwealth, which comprise 95 percent of Pennsylvania’s land area and are home to more than 5.5 million citizens — 44 percent of the state’s population. It has decided to intervene in the NIZ litigation started by Hanover and Bethlehem Townships.

Township resident Joe Schiller told the Board to keep the pressure on Allentown Mayor Edwin Pawlowski. "Maybe he'll make the developers pay for this instead of the Townships," Schiller argued.

I was very impressed by the Williams Township board, by the way. It relies heavily on volunteers who report on different aspects of Township government. There's separate Advisory Committees for the Budget, Sewer, Landfill and Land Preservation. A representative from each of these advisory committees provides an oral report at each meeting. As a result, there were 33 people in the meeting room, engaged in open and accountable government.

The Township, incidentally, is considering a repeal or amendment of three "conservation by design" ordinances adopted in 2007. They're known as 50-50 ordinances, which restricts development by a property owner with ten acres or more to either keeping 50% as open space or planning on 3 acres per house.

Halden Ballek, a fourth-generation farmer who has challenged these ordinances in Northampton County Court, told Supervisors this legislative scheme is :"discriminatory towards farmers, whose occupation requires large tracts of land to earn a living." He complained these ordinances "quietly erode people's property rights."

Resident Bob Lilley was a little more frank. "Conservation by design is simply stealing," he asserted.

Supervisor Vince Foglia is ready to pull the plug on "conservation by design," but George Washburn and Sally Hixson are leaning towards making it a voluntary scheme.

They're asking owners directly impacted by this legislation to come to their June meeting and share their experiences.

29 comments:

  1. This rhetoric about "conservation by design" is misleading. This is a much bigger topic that deserves your thoughtful consideration, not just a quote from someone in a local government meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was not doing an analysis of the concept, but was mostly reporting what some people said. But I am interested in the topic. It appears to be similar to legislation in Lower Mount Bethel Tp. I intend to do an analysis, but you might not like it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How much possible EIT revenue / detrimental development could possibly be at stake for tiny Williams Township based on the NIZ. This is getting way out of hand.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is the point of this whole thing, it is totally wrong and unconstitutional and I give them credit for standing up and taking a position.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sqrt[18.7] = 4.5 miles on each side. That's pretty small--and size has nothing to do with political power which in a democracy is properly measured by population. Speaking of which, William's population is only 4,400. And, how many of those people work downtown and might have their EIT diverted? What commercial or industrial development is there in Williams that might be diverted into the downtown with cheaper rents--Phantom Fireworks--come on. I'm not saying William's township isn't important, it just won't be harmed by the NIZ in any practical way. Emotions are running way too high about this thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you are saying Williams Township is unimportant. The latest census places its population at 5,884. It has experienced a 31.6% growth in the last ten years, compared to Allentown's 10.7%. If i were you, I would not diminish what they say or look down your nose at them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Let me also add that you have no way of knowing whether they will be harmed bc the City has refused to release financial information. Many of its residents work in offices, and where they are working ten years from now may very well be in Allentown.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Retired ASD teacher here.

    NEWSFLASH!

    Williams Township has proposed building a speedway just off I78. Huge potential for the Lehigh Valley.

    Question: Will Allentown officials approve tapping into their current and future budgets to help construct a privately-owned garage across the street?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Let's hope that speedway doesn't come, just more cornfield development in some of the prettiest land still in the lehigh valley. I'm gonna remember to specifically check the numbers when they are published regarding how much Williams Township will be loosing and rub it in your face. P.S. Way to be called out by Bill White today.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Absolutly, details of the EIT by taxing entity are needed. But, it isn't all of Allentown. Most of the NIZ area is empty or small businesses. The only significant tax question is related to Scacred Heart?

    Some of the emotional/principle aspects of the law are real issues, but there just isn't enough money to drive all this litigation.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There are 241 businesses within the NIZ, well beyond the amount stated b Garrett Strathearn when he spoke to the TCC committees. It is by no means empty or small.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How many of those businesses produce wealth for people who live outside the NIZ? A handful--maybe. Let's try to keep this debate realistic.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's impossible to keep the debate realistic when we have to guess at the numbers. That has been a major bone of contention. Until then, there is no real debate. You'll pardon me if I don't accept the word of someone who anonymously tells me to rely on Allentown to get it right bc they have consistently shut the information door in everyone's face.

    ReplyDelete
  14. " P.S. Way to be called out by Bill White today."

    You must be reading something I'm not reading. i was not called out by Bill White today. I have written him concerning his slam of Atiyeh, but that's about it. Never spoke to him about the Great NIZ debate and he did not mention me in his column today.

    ReplyDelete
  15. There can be 241 businessess in the NIZ, but there also are a lot of small businesses there. There are/were many small businesses like barber shops, tatoo parlors, cafes etc.

    They just can't have a lot of employees fron NC townships.

    The waterfront 90 acres is larely empty. The downtown NIZ has a lot of acres of parking lot.

    I just think the impression of the NIZ is that there are many businesses with significant employment. Just have to continue waiting for the numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Retired ASD teacher here.

    11:24-

    What you, and Bill White, fail to see, is a plan like this is not just conceptually wrong, but possibly illegal. The correct amount of diverted funding, legal expenses, etc. is NOT the important issue. It's the diversion itself, the method, the exposure to taxpayer risk.

    This project MUST be examined in a court of law.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Just hit the Morning Call. What is Senator Browne smoking? PSATS seems like a powerful group. He should be worried and stop the BS.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Browne screwed the pooch and has nowhere to go but into the bunker with learning-disabled Ed. He's too embarrassed to admit his disastrous mistake and the entire state is ganging up to crush his folly. Douchebag politicians love naming stuff after themselves. The hole should be named after Browne. Allentown's Browne Hole.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This whole thing sucks. I love hockey but i hate political corruption. I'm very torn.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I don't care about hockey, but love the idea of this development. It's going to be transformational for the downtown and we should be pressuring the suburban townships to back off.

    It doesn't seem like the suburban municipalities like to share. They have had all of the power and residents with income for at least 20 years.

    It's Allentown's turn.

    As to the "it's not constitutional" argument...since the Patriot Act, we haven't much cared in this country about anything being constitutional.

    ReplyDelete
  21. " It's going to be transformational "

    Pawlowski alert. Pawlowski alert.

    ReplyDelete
  22. NIZaphopics unite! Bernie you are a one trick blogger whose hatred for all things Pawlowski and Allentown is becoming a gigantic BORE. Get a real life and earn a living doing something good for society rather than tearing it down. Your weight loss included at least 16 ounces of grey matter.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It appears that Allentown doesn't even know where its own money is. According to reports, $75000 was found in a decade old account apprently no one was aware of. City Council wants it applied to general fund (?) or whatever that pays for infrastructure which has run in the red for some time. City council had financial questions and King (Mr.) Ed's regime has no answers. Seems the city can't even answer its own council's questions concerning finances.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Last comment was from Bill Coker.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "NIZaphopics unite! Bernie you are a one trick blogger whose hatred for all things Pawlowski and Allentown is becoming a gigantic BORE. Get a real life and earn a living doing something good for society rather than tearing it down. Your weight loss included at least 16 ounces of grey matter."

    And here you are, at 11 PM, telling me I'm a bore.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It appears now that Bangor may join the court case with Hanover Twsp. thru PSAB. We have the cost to join the litigation and now need to discuss the suit come the 5/14 boro council meeting. I would anticipate a close vote but we cannot afford not to join the suit in my opinion. Pandora's box needs to be closed back up before who knows what rears its ugly head henceforth. Dangerous precedent hangs in the balance here and into the future. I will vote to join the suit.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Well, it's 10:11 pm now and you are still a bore O'Hare. You have such a bug up your ass about Pawlowski that you can find nothing good about a project that will bring hundreds of jobs to our area and add another wonderful venue to improve our quality of life. You have become a stale blogger over the past two weeks with your blind crusade against the NIZ.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 1014

      EVERYTHING Bernie has exposed here is to the benefit of the majority. He has bright a bright spot light, a microscope and bright lights to what was a dark back room where greed and secrecy reigned. I and the rest of the commoners beg him to not move on to another topic.

      If the King and his Court would have been open, transparent and honest from the beginning they would not have been in the situation they are now, trying to bully and deceive with their slight of hand tactics.

      Delete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.