Local Government TV

Thursday, April 05, 2012

Northampton County Finally Has An Archives Building ... Again

By a 5-2 vote, Northampton County Council last night approved the purchase of its own archives building in Forks Township, instead of continuing to pay rent for a facility in Allentown, 22-miles away. Lamont McClure and Tom Dietrich, made the "now is not the time" argument. Bob Werner made the "If not now, when?" argument. Werner's argument persuaded John Cusick, Ken Kraft, Peg Ferraro and Scott Parsons. Bruce Gilbert and Barb Thierry were absent.

Located at 999 Conroy Place, the County will pay will pay $750,000 to Edwin Stipe for the building, which sits on an acre. The County will also have to retrofit the building, although administration officials are considering a Guaranteed Energy Savings contract to minimize cost.

Stipe paid $430,000 for the building and land when he purchased it in 2000.

Since he was first elected in 2006, Executive John Stoffa has been trying to find a home for the County archives. Below are excerpts of what he told Council last night.

"Since our former archives building was torn down approximately eight yeas ago, we have spent $1 million in rent. We spend $120,000 per year in rent. Basically, this has given us a roof over our records, but not much more.

"Our records are in Allentown, 22-miles away, and we need at least 48-hours notice to visit and review the records. The building in Allentown is in a flood zone.

"Our office across the street is cramped and is not handicapped-accessible.

"We've looked at least thirty different buildings and feel we have located an ideal structure at 999 Conroy Place in Forks Tp, four miles from the Courthouse. The purchase rice is $750,000 for 9,750 sq. ft. The land is approximately one acre, close to Rute 33, has 24 parking spaces and is handicapped-accessible. olice and fire departments are within one mile of the facility.

"Not only is this an opportunity to acquire a building which will escalate in value, but it is an opportunity for us to begin scanning, microfilming and digitizing our records.'

Stoffa indicated there are $860,000 in a "records improvement fund," which is based on a fee charged when documents are recorded. So there's enough money to buy the building, but Stoffa estimated the cost of improvements at $1.45 million.

Stoffa urged Council to approve the purchase so that the County's records "can get the attention and care they deserve."

Businessman Andy Daub, a car dealer with a sense of history, echoed Stoffa's sentiments. He told Council that some of its recorded instruments are deeds from the Penn Brothers, and need better security.

Virginia Hope came on behalf of her husband, local historian Richard Hope. Handicapped, Richard has great difficulty accessing the current archives office, and often has to wait several days to review records.

The only citizen to speak against the purchase was West Easton's Tricia Mezzacappa. Clad in luminescent green pants, she inched her way to the podium with 6" high heels and accused the Stoffa administration of being "very irresponsible."

I see.

As a title searcher, I can tell you this is needed.  In 2004, the County had the finest archives building in the state. It was a source of pride to County officials, especially when other counties called for tours. But Executive Glenn Reibman ordered its demolition for a prison expansion. Maurice Dimmick, the County's archivist at the time, welled up in tears as a wrecking ball did its dirty work. So did everyone else, when records began to disappear from a rented facility.

40 comments:

  1. Waste of money. Someone cried when a building was demolished. It was old and the prsion takes precedent, it still does but Stoffa is short on vision long on incompetence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. " the prsion takes precedent,"

    You need to go back to grade school before you can expect anyone to take what you write seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One more county building. No plan but one more building. This guy is as clueless today as he was seven years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Keep buying Northampton County, way to go. There is probably plenty of room in other buildings that can be used. Why not explore that. What about vacant Township and Boro buildings that are not being used. Why not explore that. Spend Spend Spend. Go figure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1.16 has a point. Somehow blaming Reibman for this is ridiculous. And the simple fact is, if this was such a significant priority for the County and John, it took him...6 years to find and buy a building? Really?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm glad they're spending a million and a half bucks while unemployment is 10%, foreclosures continue, an Stoffa wants a huge tax increase. You can tell Stoffa has never earned a private dollar in his life. He's lived in a fiscal fantasy land since he was old enough to beg. These dummies really know how to run things. How about proposing a one pension limit for all county employees? We'd be rid of more than half of these irresponsible spendthrifts. Life looks a lot different when you view it from atop the public pension gravy train.

    ReplyDelete
  7. " Somehow blaming Reibman for this is ridiculous. And the simple fact is, if this was such a significant priority for the County and John, it took him...6 years to find and buy a building? Really?"

    Reibman is the rocket scientist who decided to knock down a state of the art archives building to make way for a prison expansion in 2004. It was stupid. That same year, he got Council to go along with the swaption. Another brilliant move. Perhas the two dumbest things a Conty Exec has ever done in NC. He owns both messes.

    An archives was a big priority for Stoffa. He bought the Milides building, hoping to move the archives there, only to learn that there were all kinds of problems with the site. He then sent lots of time looking for a new site, looking at 30 places. He dealt with a Council in his first 4 years that opposed every move he made. It is only in his second term that he had enough Council members on board that e could actually accomplish something, so now he is moving on it.

    Could he have moved faster? Probably. But Stoffa moves at his own pace.

    ReplyDelete
  8. All property values are way down across the board in the Lehigh Valley yet somehow NC leadership can find one that has increased 100% and needs $1.4 to accommodate it's needs?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes. do you have a better site to address the County's needs? Would you rather continue flushing money down the toilet every year?

    ReplyDelete
  10. What I'm stating is perhaps better negotiating skills and more due diligence.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Does this mean the function is going totalyy in-house? Who will do the work? Union labor?

    I've used record retention services. It is not easy. Lots of procedures and skills required! It's not just a roof. Many legal issues like like HIPPA regs on medical paperwork.Right to know is new since the records were moved to Iron MT.

    I'd really like to see the cost versus benefit asnalysis?

    The trade-off of perceived timely retrieval versus cost is critical to the decision.

    ReplyDelete
  12. at 10:04

    Are you saying that our employees are not good enough to run the archive building?

    You should really sign your name when you want to make statements like this.

    ReplyDelete
  13. With this purchase the county becomes a placeholder for the eventual "owner operator"...
    Abe

    ReplyDelete
  14. I applaud this decision.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ken, I beleive people are just expressing their frustrations and feelings. According to O'Hare Stoffa gets a pass on every bad decision he has made because of Reibman. He gets a pass on every non-decision because of Reibman.

    Reibman, like every good executive, had to deal with the prison.He did. He got a lease for a building that a few people like O'Hare hated. The fees paid the lease so no tax dollars wasted. The plan was to Partner with the Northampton County Genealogical Historical Society for a building in Easton. Don't beleive it ask Andy Daub. That was a great idea. Stoffa won and he threw out that idea just like he threw out the plan that was fixing Gracedale. Why, because he is a vindictive know it all old man.

    Now the county owns another building, wonderful. The point is Stoffaa has served two terms and according to O'Hare he can do no wrong because everything is still Reibmans fault and Stoffa "owns" nothing. Which is exactly his legacy in office.

    The prison was a priority when he took office and it still is. Stoffa is the worst county executive in county history and that just burns O'Hare.

    Ms. Moncha Mulvah
    Easton

    ReplyDelete
  16. For what Stoffa intends on spending, the County could have built a state of the art archives building on the Gracedale campus.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "Ms. Moncha Mulvah"

    Another coward.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "For what Stoffa intends on spending, the County could have built a state of the art archives building on the Gracedale campus."

    You're wrong. Stoffa considered 30 different sits. The Gracedale complex was one of them. It would have been more expensive and farther away.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Stoffa isn't the worst. He's a mess, but Reibman was worse. The operation should contracted and not run by inefficient and expensive county employees. We're already spending 1.5 million while county residents continue to lose their jobs and their homes. The spending has to be brought under control.

    ReplyDelete
  20. John Stoffa the worst County Executive in history. He waited to spend $25 million on something he could have dumped his first year for nothing. He buys a another building we don't need.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "Stoffa considered 30 different sites". So the deal is if someone works hard at doing something meaningless and ends up with a silly and expensive decision, it must be good becasue he worked hard at it.

    That sums up the entire Stoffa tenure.

    ReplyDelete
  22. What sums you up is an irrational, and cowardly, disdain for a man who is much better than you.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bernie O'Hare said...
    "You're wrong. Stoffa considered 30 different sites. The Gracedale complex was one of them. It would have been more expensive and farther away."

    6:47 PM

    First Bernie, no disrespect, I enjoy your blog.

    But... I disagree. For 1.5 million the County could build a nice Archive building at the Gracedale campus where they have tons of county owned property. The property they are buying in Forks is only one acre, it looks like a steel and block warehouse, certainly not worth the money they are paying. And, by buying it they are now taking a prime commercial property off the tax rolls.

    Also, I google mapped the distance from the courthouse to Conroy Place - 6.4 miles. I googled the distance to Gracedale - 7.9 miles, not that big of a difference. Certainly a lot closer than the 22 miles away (in a different county) that it has been for the last eight years.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm glad you enjoy my blog. The Google map function does not show the shortcuts that those of us who work in and around Easton know and use. It's 4 miles. Lots of ways to get to Forks.

    As indicated, 30 sites were considered, and building at Gracedale was one of those options. It was ruled out by a committee as too costly.

    This was put off for long enough. The conditions in Allentown were inadequate. Records were deteriorating bc the humidity and temp controls are inadequate. We have a legal obligation to preserve those records, and many of them are becoming unreadable. This extends beyond the historical significance bc our entire system of real estate depends on recorded documents that can be examined. It was time to do something.

    This is also fiscally prudent. We will be spending less in the long run than we would under a lease arrangement. McClure has his eye only n next year's budget, and should be taking a more long-term view.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Just a year ago Mc Clure said we had too much money and that tax payers were being overtaxed...even suggesteed tax money be returned. Now there isn`t enough. Which is it ? Frankly he is a wind bag like butter ball Barron and doesn`t like to see progress. Try building an archives building for 750 000 dollars and see what you get. Stoffa has an 6 year record of no tax increases except for a half mill for open space. Bring back Reibman ...we need another swaption.

    ReplyDelete
  26. What "Ms. Mulvah" doesn't comment on, is that two different engineers looked at the building the historical society proffered to partner with the county and found out the floors could not handle the load if storing large quantities of archival material would have put on the building. Even the historical society realized the building was not sufficient for the intended purpose of storing that much weight on the old wooden floors. After the engineering studies showed the floors would have collapsed, the idea was not feasible. It was not a "great idea". That is why the search was looking for a one story building with a concrete base floor.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "It was a source of pride to County officials, especially when other counties called for tours. But Executive Glenn Reibman ordered its demolition for a prison expansion. Maurice Dimmick, the County's archivist at the time, welled up in tears as a wrecking ball did its dirty work."

    Please tell us why we should give a rat's ass about that part. We are not paying taxes so government goofs can be proud and sentimental.

    If the need is there, it is there. Hard to believe outsourced records management could not be more cost effective when comparing apples to apples. Maybe the current setup was inefficient but, that could simply be government being government.

    Most likely, we will have another arrogant, bloated, inefficient and, probably, unionized boondoggle in short order. And, overpaying like this - NO ONE, except government, is paying that kind of appreciation in the current market - is not something that builds confidence that the ensuing improvements and operation will be handled any more skillfully.

    -Clem

    ReplyDelete
  28. The Reibman administration demolished a building that was state of the art, it cost the taxpayers $500,000.00 to build. New construction costs for commercial buildings run about $250.00 a square foot to costruct. So building would be cost prohibitive, i think the county did ok in buying this building for $775,000.00 for the amount of square footage the building has.
    Glenn Reibman and his team of Harvard graduates demolished the archives building which wasn't even 20 years old to make room for the prison expansion.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Not everyone thinks that convicts should have a nice air conditioned drug addict lounge. Many non- government types want a prison so the bad guys don't hurt us.

    The archives building was in the way, simple. We still have a problem but I guess one of Stoffa's numerous "committees" to make decisions has not tackled that one in seven years.

    Now we have another county owned building. A crappy high priced warehouse type building in the middle of Forks. I am sure the owner is thrilled. A one hundred percent return on his investment over ten years, while the rest of us saw our real estate value go down. Things that make you go Hmmm?

    Reibman solved a problem and made a county worker cry. Stoffa solved no real problems, cost the county money by buying yet another county building and creating more county jobs of union guys to take care of it.

    Yeah he is a keeper. Oh, I am sorry, I forgot the "committee" looked at 30 properties so this is great.

    HAHA!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. It's good they did not choose Gracedale. The place will be gone in four years. There's no point in investing in that site. This is a longer term solution.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This needs to be reviewed, What is the relationship between those who approved the lease of space in Allentown and the owner of the property!

    ReplyDelete
  32. "Reibman is the rocket scientist who decided to knock down a state of the art archives building to make way for a prison expansion in 2004."

    Yeaah, you're right...something foolhardy like a prison expansion. wish Reibman had stuck to core county functio... oh wait

    ReplyDelete
  33. "That same year, he got Council to go along with the swaption. Another brilliant move. Perhas the two dumbest things a Conty Exec has ever done in NC. He owns both messes."

    if it was stupid, then it was compounded by six years of Stoffa's stupidity, as he sat on his hands and did nothing

    ReplyDelete
  34. "An archives was a big priority for Stoffa. He bought the Milides building, hoping to move the archives there, only to learn that there were all kinds of problems with the site. He then sent lots of time looking for a new site, looking at 30 places."

    they built the pentagon in 11 mnths...

    ReplyDelete
  35. 6:44 AM

    "It's good they did not choose Gracedale. The place will be gone in four years. There's no point in investing in that site. This is a longer term solution."

    So you're saying they are gonna get rid of the 911 Center, because that's on the Gracedale campus. Gracedale is a huge property. The nursing home is only a portion of it.

    ReplyDelete
  36. "they built the pentagon in 11 mnths..."

    Yes it was built in 16 months, and on a floodplain, during WWII, when the country was united.

    Stoffa spent 4 years dealing with a Council that blocked everything he tried. He did finally manage to get them to agree to purchase the Milides building, and that could not be used. He appears to finally have a Council whose majority seems more interested in doing what is right than in doing what is politically expedient. That archives building is not a luxury, but a necessity. One of the County's core functions is to preserve our real estate records, which are the vast majority of record preserved. It makes more sense to have our own archives than to rent at a facility that does not do it right.

    The Gracedale campus would be great. It is farther away, but is the geographic center of the County. I'd love it since I live in Nazareth. But it was determined to be cost prohibitive.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Hey Bernie. I realize that Stoffa has had to deal with Reibman, county council and the people but is any problem ever his problem?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Look, he is not the person who took the wrecking ball to a state-of-the-art archives building in 2004. Now, you say he moves too slowly with some justification. But I really get tired of seeing him blamed for someone else's mistakes, over and over. And the personal nature of these attacks is disgusting to me. He is a good man who sees the best in every person. He is also honest to a fault. So I get very annoyed when he is attacked personally, especially since his public life is nearly over. Give the guy some respect. That's all I ask, and that's too much for some.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Not really, is deleting and censoring opposing views too much to ask of a blog that invites people to participate?

    ReplyDelete
  40. When you use it to express irrational hate and do not identify yourself, I will delete you. It's my blog. If you don't like it, start your own.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.