Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Monday, November 14, 2011
Voter Machine Malfunction Appears to Be Nonissue in McClure Race
A citizen voted at SeWyCo in Lower Saucon around noon on Election Day. No matter how often he pushed the Connolly button, the name refused to light up. He spent time pressing it over and over before moving on to cast his vote. Because the second press cancels the vote, he is unsure whether his vote for Connolly was actually ever cast.
Bothered, he returned to the polling station about an hour later. At first, election officials were skeptical, but then one of them tried it and agreed it was a problem, so the machine was taken out of operation until a new light could be located and installed.
Why is this a nonissue? Because Connolly won in that precinct, and the margin of victory appears to be the same as another polling station at SeWyCo.
Here's how the 2 precincts at SeWyCo tallied.
Lower Saucon 7
Connolly 97
McClure 66
There was a 184-voter turnout, and 163 voted in the Council race.
Lower Saucon 8
Connolly 102
McClure 87
In this precinct, 216 people voted, and 189 cast ballots in the Council race.
If one of the machines was defective for any length of time, I would expect to see a wider disparity in the undervote, as well as more narrow margin of victory in one of these precincts. So it appears, at least to me, that this problem did not interfere in any meaningful way with the result.
But I'm still concerned about the "special" machine set up for me in Nazareth (pictured above). Something's wrong with that one.
7 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
Well aren't we all lucky. Judge O'Hare has cleared all of wrongdoing. We can all get some sleep.
ReplyDeleteThank GOD bo has deemed this a non issue.
ReplyDeletejust another excuse to cry because his boy didn't win and another silly attempt to throw mud at an enemy.
you dig your hole deeper on a daily basis.
Keep digging BO....soon you will be in that cow pasture with Ron digging cow manure for real!
ReplyDeleteJudge "Roy Bean" Bernie declares that his attempt to create controversy has failed. He now moves on to besmerch Karl. Watch out who's next....hmmmm.. let's see...
ReplyDeleteoh yes... Santa Claus is coming soon. If he stops at anyones house that supported Parsons I guess he will be accused too.
Santa Claus was seen reading the letters from the grandchildren of the Gracedale goons. Santa is a scumbag and should be shunned.
ReplyDeleteJohn Stoffa may have to disallow Christmas this year. Or maybe he, angle and O'Hara can firm a law firm on the public dime and sue Santa Claus on behalf of "good government" everywhere.
I agree. I think the Angle loss has O'Hare on the sauce again. he is really over the top on this one.
ReplyDeleteTIC TAC
ReplyDelete