Local Government TV

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Stoffa Labels Barron's Asbestos Accusation a "Bold-Faced Lie"

Northampton County Executive John Stoffa loves debates. In last year's Congressional race between John Callahan and Charlie Dent, he attended more debates than I. But you'll also often see him at candidates' nights for municipal offices, sitting quietly, but listening intently to every word said. But he was strangely absent from Tuesday night's "Debate at the Slate," featuring the Steve Barron, Steve Salvesen Controller's race, as well as the Ron Angle, Scott Parsons County Council Clash.

Steve Barron must have noted Stoffa's absence as well. When asked to explain why he went to the EPA about asbestos at County buildings, he blamed it all on Stoffa. He claimed that Stoffa told him, over lunch, to keep his mouth shut about asbestos because it might have an adverse impact on Gracedale's sales price.

I caught up with Stoffa yesterday. Instead of going to the debate, he was in Allen Township to argue for a referendum there on open space, which was adopted. "The open space will be there long after Barron and I are gone," he explained.

When I repeated Barron's accusation, he became visibly upset. "That's a bold-faced lie. I've never hid anything about asbestos. In fact, I've spent over $1 million on inspection and amelioration."

Stoffa also told me he's never have lunch with Barron.

16 comments:

  1. He did tell Steve Barron that. This time Stoffa is caught. He was unaware of a witness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brron is the biggest piece of debris to float into Easton in a long time . He is a liar from the get go and will end up being a bigger one at the end of his downfall.

    ReplyDelete
  3. isn't the term "bald-faced"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. the mere thought of those two eating together is enough to make one lose their lunch

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anon 3:46 AM:

    Still up at 3:46 AM?

    Still no job?

    Still time to make up lies?

    You coward!

    ReplyDelete
  7. "isn't the term "bald-faced"?"

    That's one of three terms used. I used the term that Sotoffa stated bc my job here is to repeat the term he used accurately, not replace it with my own version.

    "When we call a lie baldfaced or boldfaced ... either one is just fine, though baldfaced is a bit more common. But we could save ourselves trouble by following the rest of the Anglophone world, which avoids the issue simply by using barefaced for most kinds of openly shocking behavior.
    Jan Freeman, writing in the Boston Globe in June 2002."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous 3:46AM
    And despite the response by you as anonymous we should believe you were there. FUNNY

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey Chris Miller, still collecting your public pension??

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bernie I have heard you spend alot of time in the law library. Are you worried about the asbestos problem?

    ReplyDelete
  11. barron and Stoffa were eating lunch together and sharing confidences? Oh yeah,I saw them too...they were right next to Ron Angle and Ann McHale who were sharing a milkshake with two straws.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You want to hear the conversation

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh, now you're claiming to have a tape. Produce it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Stoffa wanted to cover up the asbestos problem. he claimed he was working on it. If that was the case what did he have to hide.

    It must have been the secret Stoffa plan to fix the asbestos problem.

    Sounds like the secret plan to run the county. That plan is so secret that after six years people still don't know what the hell his plan is to run the county.

    Thank god for smart county employees and autopilot. The Stoffa gang don't have a clue.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.