Local Government TV

Monday, August 22, 2011

Bethlehem Planners Don't Like Applebutter ...

Historic Farmhouse Saved
Village, that is.

Bethlehem planners unanimously rejected Applebutter Village, a proposed manufactured home park, at their August 18 meeting. Developer Chris Zajacek sought approval for a 58-unit complex. Because a PPL power line traverses the 11.8-acre tract, 58 pre-manufactured units would be have to be crammed into the western portion of the site, located along the 1100 block of Easton Road. A 5-window wide stone farmhouse at the front of the tract, built in the 1830s, would be demolished or moved.

Bethlehem's Planning Department had recommended rejecting the plan in June, but Bethlehem Attorney Jim Preston persuaded Commissioners to grant an extension because he had just been retained that day. He was to submit new plans, a point-by-point response to the Planning Department's many concerns, from fire safety to traffic. Planner Steve Thode had recommended that Preston meet with neighbors and "get everyone talking."

But that never happened. Attorney Preston confessed, "I would if I could. I'm not going to lie to you. It's not my preferred outcome."

The Planning Department still had concerns over a line-of-sight problem for traffic entering and exiting the development, located along a winding road. In addition, planners were unhappy with Zajacek's failure to address concerns over stormwater infiltration and a new pump station. Preston responded he was only seeking preliminary approval, but was told that the Bethlehem Planning Commission only approves final plans.

"I'm very uncomfortable with the various and sundry leaps of faith we are being asked to take," complained Planner Steve Thode. Echoing those concerns, and referring specifically to stormwater concerns raised by Bethlehem engineers, Planner Andy Twiggar cautioned, "You shouldn't play with guns."

Retired Bethlehem firefighter Eugene Novak, who had been employed by the City for 42 years, spoke on behalf of several neighbors. He worried that this development, which he claimed is located in a flood plain, would be a high crime area. He noted that right now, without the traffic that would be precipitated by 58 new homes, he has already experienced 14 crashes at his home at 1102 Applebutter Road. Most of all, he worried about fire. "If any home catches fire, it will go down in five minutes," he warned.

According to U.S. Fire Administration, fires in manufactured homes claim 345 lives every year, and are 32-50% more likely than in other dwellings.

In other business, Planners unanimously approved an 811-apace parking lot for Sands employees on a 10.8 acre lot, located at Founders Way and East Second Street. "We're going to need every bit of this," commented Sands President Robert DeSalvio, who predicted that a 200,000 sq. ft. retail complex will be ready by November and an event center by Spring.

Planners also unanimously approved a 122' cell tower for Metro PCS, a new wireless provider. Located at 2005 Chester Road, the tower is close to East Hills Middle School and Freedom High School, prompting Chairman Jim Fiorentino to ask, "Is this going to block East Hills and Freedom students from using their cell pones during school hours?".

"I don't think there's any way to do that," joked Metro Attorney Nicholas A. Cucé, Jr.

15 comments:

  1. That tower will look like shit in our neighborhood. Wondering how that was rammed through?

    ReplyDelete
  2. not just fires.

    think of the increase in tornados

    ReplyDelete
  3. In support of the retired fire fighter, this section of the road gets icy in the winter resulting
    in many accidents.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those cell towers are horrible. How much rent if any is the local government going to receive? Was that reported?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is this developer the same guy who owns a local real estate company?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The man it seems can do anything it wants including shutting off cell phone service.

    It happened on August 11th at the BART transit system in San Fran...

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Is this developer the same guy who owns a local real estate company?"

    I believe so.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Those cell towers are horrible. How much rent if any is the local government going to receive? Was that reported?"

    Not during the hearing. I will ask.

    ReplyDelete
  9. good, we don't need any more poor people.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I wonder what would happen if these people on the planning commission suddenly became "those people" who reside in a mobile home or become dependent on drugs and alcohol...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Big difference between manufactured (trailers) and modulars. Are these units on wheels or not? If not, they are built with exactly the same materials to the same legal standards (B.O.C.A.) as stick built and placed on foundations, rather than be constructed on site. To most people, they are indistinguishable in appearance from stick built.

    The fire claims data may not apply. Trailers burn regularly and quickly. Mods burn (or don't) with the same regularity and speed as stick built. I wonder if the guy making the statements knows the difference? Or is their fire response that slow for everybody?

    ReplyDelete
  12. anon 3:24 - no one cares - the poor deserve to be poor because that is the choice they have made. just like your boy bo made bad choices

    ReplyDelete
  13. good riddance to this trailer trash - "down in the ghetto....."

    ReplyDelete
  14. the poor deserve to be poor. God Bless the teabaggers.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If this country keeps going the way it is, we will be a 3rd world nation by 2030. A trailer park will look like a high end luxury development at that time. Not all people who live in trailers are trash...usually just cost conscious people who live within their means.

    Sad that zoning boards and planning comissions in PA are allowed to jerk people around without having to pay for it. There really needs to be some legal changes somewhere.

    Trish

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.