Local Government TV

Monday, March 07, 2011

Gracedale Grappler Otter Gets No Att'y Fees, Says Baratta

In a ruling handed down this afternoon, Judge Baratta has denied Larry Otter's motion for $21,960 in attorney's fees from me. In fact, he has sua sponte dismissed a similar claim for $8,053.65 from County Exec John Stoffa.

In his decision, Baratta offers this observation. "[T]here is no suggestion, let alone proof, of any conduct which could be considered vexatious, in bad faith or otherwise improper. The dispute before us was clearly a bona fide legal dispute. The issues raised by the Objectors, based on the quality of their pleadings and the record they presented during the February 4, 2011 hearing, were legitimate and brought in good faith. In fact, with regard to many of their objections, Mr. O'Hare and Mr. Angle were the prevailing party. They established that thousands of signatures were invalid, either because the signatures themselves did not meet the requirements of the Election Code or there were defects related to the circulators and/or the manner in which certain petitions were circulated."

For the legal eagles among you, Baratta's decision is below. Basically, he is saying Larry otter' know better.

Baratta Denial of Otter Request For Att'y Fees

25 comments:

  1. No clams for the otter! Baratta finally makes a wise decision!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "No clams for the otter!"

    That's good!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marlin Pekins, Esq.March 7, 2011 at 6:10 PM

    Congratulations to you and kudos to the judge for not succumbing to the wile and power of otter spraint.

    MP

    ReplyDelete
  4. Att'y Perkins, We could not have done it without your insightful treatises.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Now the judge is a genius
    funny

    ReplyDelete
  6. Some days the bear eats you...You know how it goes. Congrats.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How does otter taste? I saw the guy on the Travel channel eat one and he said it was swampy and grassy but in a good way? Congrats again.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This judge is far from being a genius. This decision he could have been dialed in. It was a frivelous law suit from a hungry otter.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This one was a gimme from the judge to O'Hare. One bloodsucker going after other bloodsuckers, the judge did well.

    This will be the last victory for O'Hare and company(Angle, Stoffa gang) regarding Gracedale.

    The people will get a say.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree. The people get to decide who represents them. They don't get to decide how many rolls of toilet paper the County should have on hand.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bernie , You only wish you were
    an otter.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dave & Brenda, Thank you. I would rather have won the first case and lost this one.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Now....aren't you ashamed of yourself for all the nasty things you said about a very good JUDGE. Congrats on your win. Enjoy it. Please stop trashing a very respectable Judge

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have not trashed Judge Baratta at all concerning this matter, although I have criticized his reasoning and opinions, especially on the Home Rule Charter issue.

    If I thought he could not be fair, I would have objected to him deciding this case. If you look at my reaction to his opinion against me, I thought I was pretty fair, at least by my standards. His reasoning on the Charter question, however, is completely illogical, and I stated that as well.

    Remember, I'm appealing him. I would not be doing that if I thought he was right about everything. But I have never trashed him personally over this matter.

    I did trash him when he was running for retention a few years ago, but have seen enough of him to realize now that I would vote for him, even though he ruled against me. He's a bright guy who tries to be fair.

    ReplyDelete
  15. He understands the legality of the Home Rule Charter better than you or that crook Angle.

    ReplyDelete
  16. According to your standards?
    I relation to the law?

    Please fill free to comment about Bernies standards in relation to the law.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. You were never really worried about losing this one, were you Bernie? After all, as the Judge points out, you were the prevailing party on some of your claims. I think the Otter should try and get more money from his own clients next time.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I wasn't worried about losing the first one. This time, I was worried.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Good for you Bernie... The otter is a fool and a money grabber

    ReplyDelete
  21. Awesome news, Bernie. Very glad for you!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Who gives a shit!

    ReplyDelete
  23. You do, enough to post a comment here claiming you don't.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.