Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Dent: Use Stim Funds to Help Seniors and Vets Denied COLA
When the rate cap comes off PPL in January, this will hurt many seniors and disabled LV vets. Dent believes we can use stimulus funds that are borrowed but haven’t been spent, to provide help to seniors and veterans without increasing taxes or adding to our nation’s ballooning deficit.
“Since the stimulus funding has failed its original purpose — to stimulate the economy and create jobs — it makes sense to use the bill’s unobligated funds to help our deserving seniors and veterans,” Congressman Dent said.
12 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
These funds are borrowed and will increase our deficit. It is a noble cause but we should be taking these borrowed funds that haven't been spent and use them to pay down the deficit.
ReplyDelete(Ugh) Just when I thought that Dent was a pragmatic voice of fiscal restraint, he floats this balloon filled with hot air and more than a trace of pander. Because one of the most fiscally irresponsible pieces of federal legislation failed in its attempt to stimulate the economy, we should divert the remaining "loot" to provide a COLA for vets and seniors. What happens when it runs out? Won't they be in exact same position?
ReplyDeleteHey 12:22, he has a tough election coming up and who better to pander to but vets and seniors. Charlie knows the game well.
ReplyDeleteThe only idea better than giving the tax payers some of their money back is to not confiscate from them more than needed to cover the basic cost of government in the first place.
ReplyDeleteScott Armstrong
Charlie looks out for veterans, and I won't beat him up for this.
ReplyDeleteInteresting point by a Republican..he says since Stimulas funds have already been misdirected why not misdirect them some more..Gotta love it!!
ReplyDeleteWhat part of "Cost Of Living Adjustment" does Charlie not understand? It's like Bernie refusing to state when government budgets should be slashed in good times, after stating it's the wrong thing to do in tough times. Populist politics is a circle jerk and Dent's a master. I thought Charlie was above using my tax dollars for his targeted political campaigning.
ReplyDeleteWhen the caps come off PPL rates in January, that alone will justify what Dent is doing.
ReplyDelete"When the caps come off PPL rates in January, that alone will justify what Dent is doing."
ReplyDeleteIt's a misuse of a federal program with Dent using public money to court seniors. The rest of the country isn't served by PPL. He should work to address their rate hike issue - although he likely supported deregulation and is now attempting to cover his ass.
Where the hell are Grucela and Freeman and Dally and the rest of the local public teet suckers on this very local issue? They're drooling over their benefits and pensions and won't have to worry about paying the rate increase.
It's time to send these local wastes of skin into the private sector - where they'll likely fail miserably. I'd love to interview any one of these slackers for a position with my company. I always get a kick out deer-in-the-headlights applicant who are tragically ill-prepared for the real world.
Sounds like someone is up pandering for senior votes.
ReplyDeleteI guess Dent is an economist now, since he claims "stimulus funding has failed its original purpose — to stimulate the economy and create jobs..."
I am not sure how rate caps expiring in one area of the county justifies this proposal...sounds like more pandering to the locals!
Here is another take on Dent's proposal:
ReplyDeletehttp://wilkinsr.blogspot.com/2009/10/charlie-dents-voodoo-economics.html
Charlie voted to remove rate caps while in the Pa legislature. Perhaps he wants those seniors tp forget that. Besides Charlie did not vote for Recovery Bill now he wants to play Santa. Good try Charlie.
ReplyDelete