Local Government TV

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Is a Dog Park Possible in Bethlehem Township?

In response to yesterday's post about Nazareth's dog park, someone had this remark: "I'd love to see Bethlehem Township do this. Is it possible they have no funds from impact fees available? Otherwise they wouldn't want to raise taxes to pay for new soccer field, I guess."

Bethlehem Township Manager Jon Hammer told me "nothing is off the table." The township does receive a $1,500 impact fee for every residence built, although in some cases, developers donate green space. "We're pretty built out," he conceded, acknowledging there won't be much in the way of impact fees. But Hammer noted hopefully that the township has recently received a fifty-seven acre tract of land, devised by the Housenick estate. How that land is used is up to Bethlehem Township residents.

Located off Christian Spring Road, the Housenick parcel includes the mansion of Archibald Johnson, Bethlehem's first mayor. In 1919, as Bethlehem Steel prepared for a strike, Johnson armed mounted police with nightsticks and barred assembly by more than three persons.

Ahhh, the good 'ol days. Instead of dog parks, Johnson seemed more intent on creating pens for people.

5 comments:

  1. Johnson's response to your blogging about him probably wouldn't have been limited to commenting on your sordid past.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This guy from Quakertown has a very insightful and profound take on dog parks: http://www.mcall.com/news/opinion/letters/all-nosal.6534755aug06,0,1015414.story

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon 7:46, The good ol' days. I prefer getting anonymous letters featuring me as a star in some gay porn flick to having my head caved in, but that's me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Shit you are flinging around makes you worse than a dog. Don't you realize how your hatred of your community is viewed outside of it?-
    California Beach Bum

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.