From where I was sitting, in the cheap seats, I could not hear some of the things Stoffa said when he finally rose to address council. He's a quiet man. But Stoffa did apparently accuse McHale of sour grapes because the county cancelled an insurance policy or two with T.J. McHale & company, where she is employed.
Here's what an anonymous commenter has added. "McHale and her husband had insurance policies with the county from the Reibman Administration. Apparently two of the policies were cancelled or expired and she was not too happy. Stoffa did not renew them. Maybe this is all that this is about. How can she do business with the county and serve on County Council? Would she exercise this kind of judgement if she were county Executive? Bernie, do you have any information about this?"
I spent some time today gathering that information.
Does McHale Do Business With the County?
T.J. McHale & Co. is a general insurance company, located in Bethlehem since 1973. McHale is currently Treasurer. Her husband, Tom, is President and CEO.
Last year, T.J. McHale & Company was paid $6,346 for two liability policies with Northampton County. This year, the county has only paid $458. It has cancelled at least one policy with a $5,888 premium. Is this why McHale is upset?
Not according to her. As she told me yesterday, most of the commission on those premiums is paid to the agent who first negotiated those insurance contracts. That person is T.J. Rooney, who just happens to chair the Pennsylvania Democratic Party. He wrote those policies before McHale was even a member of council.
I wonder if he's pissed. T.J. does share some of that commission with her company, but considering that a property insurance commission averages 5.5 per cent, we're talking about very little money.
How can McHale Do Business With the County and Serve on County Council?
That's the real question. Is it a conflict of interest for McHale, a sitting council member, to do business with the county at all? The county's Home Rule Charter has a procedure to govern that situation. Elected official like McHale, who does have an interest in T.J. McHale & Company, is required to disclose any business relationship between her company and the county. If it amounts to a conflict, council can bar her from debating or voting on any matter involving her company.
Has McHale disclosed this possible conflict? As a matter of fact, she informs council in a letter once every year. She does more than that. She flatly declares she'll abstain from any vote involving her husband's company.
"Prior to my becoming a member of Northampton County Council, T.J. McHale & Co., Inc. began providing a limited amount of insurance coverage to Northampton County. I do not feel this constitutes a conflict of interest as outlined in the Northampton County Home Rule Charter Section 810 since I do not receive any profits directly from the contract that provides coverage for Northampton County. I have not, nor will I, participate in the debate, or vote on matters relating to the County's acquisition or retention of insurance policies and/or coverage in which I have either a direct or indirect financial interest."
Now if McHale hid the existence of this relationship, or voted on her insurance company, I'd agree she is acting unethically. But her own records with council reveal that she has not only disclosed that connection, but has also pledged to recuse herself from any votes concerning her company. I am often critical of Ann McHale, but she has handled this with integrity.
Bernie,
ReplyDeleteBut what is the LAW? Did Stoffa require County Council approval or not for his decision?
It does not matter if Stoffa is a great guy or even it what he did is 'right'. It doesn't even matter if he is honorable or moral.
This is the problem with government. Too many say, to hell with the incoveniences of laws, charters and statutes, as long as we are doing what is so obviously 'correct'.
Bernie, what does the law say?
Joe,
ReplyDeleteStoffa violated the administrative code. It requires council approval for all contracts in excess of $100,000. Stoffa executed the contract and, in fact, paid the first year's premium without council approval. He did so because the county needs insurance. I am not attempting to excuse his error. It is serious, demonstrates a lack of attention to important details and sets a precedent for another executive to just ignore the administrative code. Instead of attacking McHale, as Stoffa apparently did, he should have acknowledged his error. It should not have occurred.
i suspect you might have pilloried reibman much more enthusastically for the same mistake.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct. It is because of Reibman that those changes to the administrative code were made in the first place. They are designed to discourage a "pay to play" culture. Because Stoffa's mistake was admitted and unintentional, it's hard to jump all over him. But he sets a bad precedent and really should not be making this kind of mistake now.
ReplyDeleteANN MCHALE IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A CLASS ACT.
ReplyDeleteThe bottom line is Stoffa ignorned the law. He may be treated differently than other County Executives but his actions were wrong and should be condemned not excused.
ReplyDeleteCounty Council is a group of paper tigers and Ron Angle is a hypocrite.
Council should investigate what other laws, like Local Labor Ordinace, are being ignored.
Stoffa was wrong. I do condemn his failure to follow the Administrative Code. Now what do you want to do, draw and quarter him?
ReplyDeletePlease explain how the local labor ordinance is beiong violated.
I must say the unions in Northampton County, made necessary by the Reibman layoffs, have been a disappointment. So far as I know, they've helped no one. They've even cost two people their jobs.