Local Government TV

▼

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Why 6thTuesday Pre-Election Campaign Finance Reports Should Be Mandatory For All Elections in Pa.

Under current Pa. law, only statewide candidates must file 6th Tuesday pre-election reports, which cover the period between June 8 and September 22. Other nominees, including state house and senate candidates, can wait to detail their expenses until October 23, 2026, the 2d Friday before the actual election. This system worked when most people voted on election day. People could inform themselves in advance about who is financing electoral hopefuls.  That system no longer works. 

Changes in our election laws now permit Mail-in Ballots and Ballot by Demand well in advance of election day. Candidates have responded by intensifying their fundraising efforts much sooner than in previous campaigns. You can see this in your mailbox on a near daily basis. Those who wait to make their pitches risk losing a critical segment of voters who prefer the convenience and simplicity of MIBs and Ballot-by-Demand over standing in line at the polling place. 

The problem is that many who chose to exercise these voting alternatives have no idea who is funding the campaigns of the politicians they choose. They are unable to follow the money in any meaningful way. 

For that reason, the state legislature should change current campaign finance laws to make 6th Tuesday pre-election reports mandatory in all campaigns. 

9 comments:

  1. Finally saw a campaign ad detailing the lousily dangerous driving record of Warren.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It really doesn't make a difference. Very few people actually research before they vote. Most just blindly press the "D" or the "R" button.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The problem is that many who chose to exercise these voting alternatives have no idea who is funding the campaigns of the politicians they choose."

    That's the idea, silly naive boy. It's time to end early voting. One day to vote, with exceptions for military serving out of the country. Dragging out voting and counting is fertile ground for cheating. We all know it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those TV ads for Brooks are really good (production of, themes); must have cost big bucks, coming from outside the region, most likely.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those TV ads against Brooks are really good (production of, themes); must have cost big bucks, coming from outside the region, most likely.

      Delete
    2. Brooks is an embarrassment! I have no idea how someone can support such a loser- he screwed everyone in his life, including his family.

      Delete
    3. Is Stacy Garrity still running? I haven't seen 1 ad or mailer from her campaign. She's getting pummeled by Shapiro ads.

      Delete
  5. Is Brooks using the dough he ripped off from his family? In fairness, politicians are required to be dishonest crooks and he carries those qualifications like a badge of honor.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You’re trying to fix a problem that shouldn’t exist.

    The worse problem is that a candidate could commit murder on Oct 31, and could already have a majority of his vote in the bank. Add to that the increased risk of cheating, the condensed campaigning time in the primaries (which of course favors incumbents) and the downward effect on the number of candidate debates, to name a few other problems caused by election season instead of Election Day.

    The problem isn’t the campaign reporting, it’s that we’re not voting at the same time any more.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.