Every Pennsylvania county has a board of elections or elections commission, whose job is to administer elections each year. In NorCo, the elections commission consists of three members of the majority party and two members of the minority party. In Lehigh, the elections board consists of the county executive or his designee, one member of the majority party and one member of the minority party. If he is up for re-election or running for another office, the President Judge appoints someone to replace him, but that person must be from the same party as the executive.
In both counties, the elections board is designed to give the majority party the deciding vote. This bothered Sarah Fevig, a newly elected Lehigh County Commissioner. So she went to work, drafting and researching a proposed change to Lehigh County's Home Rule Charter that will add an independent voter to the board. That way, the ability of the major parties to politicize the elections process will be minimized. A measure like this, which requires the assent of voters in a county-wide referendum, could also help restore faith in the integrity of our elections.
Fevig gave a detailed explanation of her rationale at a committee meeting on Wednesday. She proposes modernizing the county’s election governance structure to better reflect current demographic, political, and institutional realities. Lehigh's Home Rule Charter, established in 1978 and last updated in 1986, provides for a three-member board: the county executive and one representative from each major political party. She believes this results in a partisan majority and presents potential conflicts of interest, particularly when the executive must recuse himself as a candidate.
She added that there's been significant changes over time—including substantial population growth, an increase in independent voters, and evolving national concerns about election integrity. She suggests that her proposal establishes a more balanced and representative system.
Under her proposal, the election board would expand from three to five members. It would include two representatives from each of the two largest political parties, but importantly, would add one representative from the third-largest affiliation. Currently, this would result in two Democrats, two Republicans, and one independent member. It would eliminate any single-party majority and introduce a broader range of perspectives.
The independent member would have to be someone who has been registered as an independent for two years.
Current elected officials and candidates would be unable to serve on the board, aiming to reduce political influence and conflicts of interest. Political parties could still nominate candidates, but residents would also be able to apply and participate in interviews for board positions.
The Board of Commissioners to remove members for cause if they fail to properly fulfill their duties. Furthermore, the county executive (or designee) would continue to participate as a non-voting, ex officio member, ensuring coordination between the election board and the county administration without exerting direct control.
Lehigh County is indisputably blue, so as a political matter, why would Democrats support this change? Fevig, several Democratic Commissioners like Dan Hartzell and Geoff Brace, offered their support. It was even supported by Exec Josh Siegel. They argue this reform will strengthen public trust in elections by ensuring fairness, transparency, and shared responsibility across political lines. Particular attention was given to the growing number of independent voters and the importance of including their representation in election oversight.
The next step is to present this proposal as a ballot measure for voters to consider in November, allowing the public to directly decide whether to adopt the new system.
This is perhaps the best piece of legislation I've seen in county government in recent years. Northampton County should consider a similar measure.
Elections have consequences. This is designed to thwart the wishes of the majority. In the real world, nobody is Independent, regardless of labels they give themselves.
ReplyDeleteSomeone pee in your corn flakes this morning?
DeleteAlmost everyone agrees that election integrity is a critical issue that demands impartial oversight to protect every voter’s trust.
ReplyDeleteThis proposal seems to focus on removing conflicts of interest, so all candidates and voters can trust the final outcome no matter who wins or loses.
Scott Janney
Good Idea, but the county is really going to have to educate the voters on this.
ReplyDeleteThis is just dumb, on all levels, what she doesnt have anything else to do with her time?
ReplyDeleteAQs long as democrats are around there will be cheating. TRUTH HURTS Bernie
ReplyDeleteName-calling is so satisfying, but the lack of facts and evidence for the proposition that Democrats cheat at elections, and the 60 dismissed lawsuits in which MAGA alleged cheating, speak for themselves
DeleteSo who picks the independent? There is no party chair for independents.
ReplyDeleteIf it’s the executive or the Board of Commissioners it makes the whole system worse.
Not only will the executive pick a rubber-stamper to vote the way he wants, but the executive will still have influence over the board as a non-voting member.
On the surface, this appears to be a way to game the system even more, under the guise of fairness.
But will county voters be dumb enough to approve this?
Let’s see: They elected an office-hopping narcissist as Executive; a certified nut-job as commissioner (and later as MDJ); and then a drug dealer as her replacement. Not to mention the Allentown voters who voted a soon-to-be felon into the Mayor’s office, while he was under investigation by the FBI for corruption.
So I guess that Lehigh County is the perfect place for such stupidity
This sounds like a great idea. Personally, I don't like the majority party having an edge on an elections board. It is interesting that the executive supports the change, which would remove him/her from the board.
ReplyDelete