Local Government TV

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Zrinski Wants Bus Service in Slate Belt To Continue

As most of you know, I'm an old fart. I live in an apartment building specially set up for old farts and younger disabled people with limited incomes. I like it. My next door neighbor (he passed away a few weeks ago) was a retired garbage man who spent 40 years on the back of the trucks. Another was a drummer for famous singers like Whitney Houston and Aretha Franklin. One fellow - a giant of a man - provided security for celebrities in California before going blind. I could go on and on, and maybe one day I will tell their stories. One thing that most of us appreciate is the LANTA bus. There is a stop right outside the building. At one time, it was served by two separate routes. (217 & 216). Now it's just one (216), and that will no longer serve Nazareth at the end of June. There will still be service from another route, but it will be far more limited. This will affect several residents who rely on LANTA. It will also impact several other Nazareth residents whom I have seen on the bus from time  

I realize this is a "poor person" issue. I often hop on a bus, especially when riding my bike so I can pretend I went farther than I actually did. I've seen the people who rely on buses to get to jobs at restaurants, Walmart and local industrial parks. One Spanish lady - she does not speak a word of English or pretends not to when I'm on the bus - always has a piece of fruit for me. 

Although Governor Josh Shapiro is pushing for $292 million in mass transit funding statewide, his quest faces an uncertain fate in the Republican held state senate. LANTA is planning to reduce service by 20%. This should have little impact if you live in downtown Allentown, Bethlehem or Easton. But the farther you are from the urban core, the more difficult it will be to get around. It will be especially tough for Slate Belt residents. They are often little more than an afterthought among elected officials, so I was surprised to see a press release from NorCo Controller and Exec candidate Tara Zrinski about bus service to the slate belt (Route 217), which will be reduced at the end of the month.

Her news release states that Route 217 is being eliminated, but my understanding is that service is just being reduced. Here's what she says:

As the Democratic nominee for Northampton County Executive, and as a former county councilmember and current county controller, I am deeply concerned about the proposed elimination of Route 217 and other essential bus services in the Slate Belt region.

While I do not reside in the Slate Belt, I understand that public transportation is a lifeline for many Northampton County communities. Route 217 connects residents to jobs, medical appointments, grocery stores, and vital services. Surveys show that the vast majority of riders—about three-quarters—have no other transportation option. Eliminating this route would strand those without access to a car—especially in rural areas where alternatives are scarce.


It is especially important to recognize that many individuals in recovery from addiction rely on these bus routes to reach recovery centers, counseling sessions, and support group meetings. Reliable transportation is essential for successful recovery; without it, missed appointments can disrupt progress and increase the risk of relapse. 


Seniors, low income individuals/families and the disabled are all especially vulnerable to these proposed cuts. Reductions in fixed-route and paratransit services will limit their ability to reach medical appointments, grocery stores, and social activities, leading to increased isolation and diminished quality of life. The planned 25% fare increase on the Shared Ride for Seniors program and restricted service days and hours will further compound these challenges.


Removing Route 217 would undermine the hard-won progress of many in our community.

Northampton County has consistently advocated for equitable bus route allocation, ensuring that all residents—regardless of location—have access to essential services. To take these routes away now would undermine years of progress and jeopardize the well-being of those in recovery from opioid addiction and other substance use disorders.


Where can LANTA get the money?

LANTA’s funding challenges are real. The transit authority has relied on federal COVID relief funds, but those have now run out. Governor Shapiro’s proposed budget includes a $6.6 million increase in state operating funds for LANTA, which could help avoid devastating service cuts. Additionally, the Governor has proposed increasing the transit share of the state sales tax, which could provide LANTA with millions more annually if approved by the legislature. Federal grants, such as those from the Federal Transit Administration and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, also remain important funding sources.


I urge LANTA and state leaders to prioritize these funding solutions and to preserve essential services for all communities. Northampton County is a growing community and, as part of the Lehigh Valley our services are essential to that economic growth. Public transportation is not just about mobility—it’s about access, opportunity, and dignity. We must not let funding shortfalls harm our most vulnerable residents.

44 comments:

  1. I want to drink gallons of sweet tea and not get diabetes She loves puppies, but can she save them all? Barron wrote a poor say nothing political piece for her.
    Please tell us you are not already campaigning for her?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your comment just drips with an utter disregard for the working poor. I am sure that Tom Giovanni, who is also running for Exec, agrees with Tara that the state needs to step up. You want to punish people bc they use mass transit. I would not compare that to drinking sweet tea.

      Delete
  2. Hi Bernie,

    In regards to this point: "Her news release states that Route 217 is being eliminated, but my understanding is that service is just being reduced."

    Tara is correct. The proposed budget calls for entirely eliminating service to the Slate Belt and Walnutport. See here:
    https://lantabus.com/2025/05/20/2026-fy-proposed-budget/

    As a member of a governing body in the Slate Belt, I'm extremely concerned about this proposed elimination and what it will mean for seniors, the disabled, and working families in Wind Gap and the rest of the Slate Belt, and I appreciate Tara bringing wider attention to this impact. As you say, the people up here are too often forgotten, and LANTA can't be allowed to forget them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jason, Thanks. The proposed budget does call for elimination, nut the changes going into effect on 6/30 will not actually eliminate the route. Service will be reduced., not eliminated. https://lantabus.com/june-2025-service-changes/route-217/

      Delete
    2. He would agree w/ Zrinski, since he spent1 year on Wind Gap Coucil, and like her, is always looking for the next gig. County Council doesn't need another liberal, squandering money.

      Delete
    3. "He would agree w/ Zrinski"

      I do agree with Tara that the Slate Belt needs and deserves bus service, yes. It's an issue that concerns a whole lot of people up here. The Slate Belt has a larger percentage of people living under the poverty line then Northampton County as a whole, and has a higher percentage of people over 65 (over 17% of the population). That speaks to the need for reliable bus service so people aren't being cut off from things they need to live.

      Both Bangor Borough and Pen Argyl Borough sent letters to LANTA opposing the cut, and I introduced and passed the motion on Wind Gap Borough Council to send a letter opposing it as well.

      "like her, is always looking for the next gig."

      Not really. I have a successful career outside of politics. I'm not looking to give up my full time job.

      "County Council doesn't need another liberal, squandering money."

      Please feel free to point out any money I've squandered. I voted against the most recent property tax increase, and I voted against a $400,000 project to pave our municipal building parking lot because I didn't believe it was a good use of taxpayer money.

      County council needs people who understand budgets and finance and will commit to using taxpayer money wisely and efficiently and that's what I'm going to bring to council.

      Delete
  3. SEPTA sucks all the transportation money up. It’s horrible and poorly run. The rest of the state suffers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. but if they eliminate it how will John B get to county council meetings?

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Her news release states that Route 217 is being eliminated, but my understanding is that service is just being reduced."

    So, she's lying. That's awesome. Thanks for exposing her. Voters should beware. "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus." What other lies has she told? What other lies will she tell? What a disgrace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't find out where the money went!!!! Wait isn't that your job??? Gotta hold off with that report till she can win the primary.

      Delete
  6. My paternal grandfather rode a trolley from his home in Pen Argyl to his job at Bethlehem Steel for the first half of his career there. And my maternal grandparents, who lived in Wind Gap, occasionally took the train from Pen Argyl to NYC for the day. It's unfortunate how the state of mass transit has devolved over time.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As a LANTA user for the past 15 years, I have experienced the constant adjustments and whittling down of routes and stops until it has become almost unusable by the people who depend upon it most. First was the removal from Hamilton Street in Allentown, dooming the merchants and lower income and elderly who depended on it. I then witnessed the removal from downtown Easton, with no stops now between 6th and Northampton to the Easton Transfer Center on South 3rd Street. Imagine an elderly person walking up that hill to Sixth, to get to food shopping, as anywhere downtown is almost a food desert, as the Easton Public Market is wildly overpriced. The LANTA management must be replaced by people who know transportation, and LANTA population areas.

    ReplyDelete
  8. LANTA's route adjustments, to take place on June 30, are designed to drive away passengers and lead to the elimination of LANTA. Let them call UBER!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would like to see the total cost per person to provide transportation from these more rural areas. Not in an effort to deny service but to see if there are other cheaper more efficient ways to transport individuals. It should include the cost from the federal government down. Imagine every bean counter along the way from feds on down to transport one person.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sounds like California's speed train is being pushed around here by the state now.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think its obvious someone wrote this for her. She doesn't have the intelligence t write such a piece.

    ReplyDelete

  12. Where does their money come from?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are various sources. Its total budget is $66.8 million, and $44.8 million comes from federal, state and local government. The state is the largest contributor, at $36.8 million. The local subsidy is just 3%. https://lantabus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FY2026-BUDGET-PACKET-FINAL.pdf

      Delete
  13. Good for Zrinski. Cozze would have said the buses aren't gay enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Amy would have just found the money for it. Not put herself out there like some hero. It's nice having friends other then just Lamont. That man's political career is dead.
      Where's the money??????

      Delete
  14. It's mid-June. Where are the 2024 audited financial statements?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Tara is our ONLY choice for County Executive this year for exactly this reason. She knows what it's like to rely on public services and truly cares about everyone's livelihoods in Northampton County. Giovanni is a do-nothing, say-nothing candidate on the county council and doesn't have the cojones to stand up for anything that John Brown doesn't support. We support Tara 100%.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Folks from LV’s CAT - me included - went to Harrisburg earlier this month to the Transit4AllPA rally and lobbying day. The state capitol was packed with folks like us visiting our state senators. Our three - Boscola, Miller, and Coleman - had already left to come back here when we went to visit. Miller’s staff was kind. Coleman’s staffer was cool of temperament. Boscola’s staff welcomed us in and her staff member and an assistant spent about a half hour with us.

    This has everything to do with the funding bill not coming out of the state senate because Senator Pittman of western PA does not think SEPTA is a good steward of money AND more money for rural bridges please.

    This is a huge political game far above Zrinski’s or LANTA’s pay grade. Bernie, your pain points are important. If this didn’t pass, it will ripple far out from the Slate Belt and hit the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh economies hard. The Main Line commuter trains - gone - because SEPTA will stop paying rent to Amtrak for use of the tracks. Some service will continue to Colmar (our favorite station) though. Crowded roads, caregivers who can’t give care to kids/old/disabled, Amazon and Uline workers…

    A political sausage may or may not get born by June 30. It will be a big hit to the state if transit isn’t funded.

    People

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anyone who starts a statement off with their policatial resume is not looking to help anyone but themselves. This girl is ridiculous. She needs help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She doesn't give a shit about Wind Gap or the Slate Belt

      Delete
  18. A steering committee needs to form to evaluate why any bus route cuts are needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another committee? Please. It's clear to me that LANTA will need to reduce service and increase fares unless the state senate approves more funding for mass transit. It is up to them. Based on what I see, I believe some routes, like the 106, make money for LANTA. 216 can get crowded at peak hours. Routes like 217 (and 312) are used less but that's bc the route is always changing. It used to go from downtown Bethlehem to the slate belt, and then changes were made bc some bridge needed repairs, and Nazareth was cut out.

      Delete
  19. "Seniors, low income individuals/families and the disabled are all especially vulnerable to these proposed cuts. Reductions in fixed-route and paratransit services will limit their ability to reach medical appointments, grocery stores, and social activities, leading to increased isolation and diminished quality of life. The planned 25% fare increase on the Shared Ride for Seniors program and restricted service days and hours will further compound these challenges."

    Bernie, At 6:30 am the Allentown Transit Center is a buzz of folks waiting to hop on a LANTA bus to get to work, school, doctor appts. and more. To curtail any of these bus routes will harm so many that count on this service.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It's almost impossible to talk to a live person in LANTA management.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bernie thanks for the link to Lanta's budget, it is interesting reading.

    Know what I find most interesting? Passenger fares account for only 7% of total revenue. Grants/subsidies account for 93%.

    I know Septa has always operated in a hole (even before COVID, when all the trains and buses were packed, the State still sent $100 million to Septa every year), but fares accounting for only 7% just shocks the conscience.

    I'm sorry to say I don't have a solution. But there has to be one out there somewhere that supports needs but is more balanced.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Must be a slow news day. Yawn …

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why is the person in charge of oversight of Northampton County budgets and Northampton County Operationsl Procedures examining the
    Lanta routes and their service?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Could anybody imagine Kamala in charge now?

    ReplyDelete
  25. The premise that the poor and elderly should have access to transportation services is good and just.

    The reality is that the bus line that travels through the slate belt and Nazareth is very lightly used. I see these buses in transit often, as I live between Easton and Wind Gap.

    They are almost always entirely empty.

    At what point does such a route become more of an economic drain than a service utilized by very few?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Should mass transit not be dependent on it's own when it comes to budgeting?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Tara thinks someone really believes these are her thoughts. Geez. Vote Giovanni!

    ReplyDelete
  28. No matter how much $ LANTA gets, it's never enough! Reminds me of SEPTA, and the billions spent in California for hi-speed Rail that never happened.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Must've been a slow news night for you- this is a sophmoric post. Who doesn't want better public transportation options? Please stop your Zrinski Campaign ads- shes an unqualified lightweight.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Let’s continue to discuss the controller’s audit that didn’t contain Lanta bus routes, but was offered after the election and contained alleged misappropriation of monies that both the executive and controller may have known about and conveniently waited to disclose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The controller's audit was done right after the office had finished its work for the independent auditor. Zrinski explained this and Council agreed. You have absolutely no evidence that $ was "misappropriated". In fact, it was not misappropriated. The money went into Gracedale's general fund and was spent for the upkeep of Gracedale. You also have zero evidence that the Controller or even the Exec knew this. Your comment is pure political horseshit. I do think this was handled poorly by McClure and I believe he disregarded Council's express intentions, but you shamelessly and dishonestly imply criminal activity when you know there is none.

      Delete
    2. There is no paper trail for where the budgeted money was taken from or where it went and for what reason….not good government practice

      Delete
  31. Shouldn't we have a complete audit before they get more money? Maybe they are mismanaging it. If so why give more money. Just like SEPTA has no money. Why are these companies losing money?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Wouldn’t it be easier to just have those who use LANTA pay what it costs to drive them around?

    I’m happy that you live in a place that you like, but it shouldn’t be my responsibility to pay for you to get where you want to go.

    If people can’t afford to pay what it costs, why not give them an annual stipend to use as they see fit? They might not want to spend it on LANTA and might prefer to use UBER or something else.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.